Skip to main content
Log in

A language perspective on the development of plastic multimodal user interfaces

  • Published:
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing complex interactive systems requires the collaboration of actors with very different background. As a result, several languages and tools are used in a single project with no hope for interoperability. In this article, we examine whether a universal language is a realistic approach to UI specification by looking for answers into the domain of Linguistics while finding analogies in software engineering. Then, we explore one particular avenue from main-stream software engineering: that of Model Driven Engineering where the notion of transformation is key to the definition of bridges between languages and tools. Building upon these two analyses, we then show how model-driven engineering can be successfully exploited in the development and execution of plastic multimodal UIs illustrated with a variety of complementary tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Weiser, “The computer for the 21st century”,Scientific American, vol. 265, pp. 94–104, September 1991, 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Barralon and J. Coutaz, “Coupling Interaction Resources in Ambient Spaces: There is More than Meets the Eye”, inProc. of Engineering Interactive Systems 2007 (IFIP WG2.7/13.4 10th Conference on Engineering Human Computer Interaction jointly organized with IFIP WG 13.2 1st Conference on Human Centred Software Engineering and DSVIS-14th Conference on Design Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems) EIS’2007 (M. B. Harning and J. Gulliksen, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, March 2007. 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Jacob, A. Girouard, L. Hirshfield, M. Horn, O. Shaer, E. T. Soloway, and J. Zigelbaum, “CHI2006: What is the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction?”,Business leadership and the UX manager, vol. 14, pp. 53–58, 2007, 1

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Coutaz and G. Calvary, “The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, ch. HCI and Software Engineering: Designing for User Interface Plasticity, Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers, Mahwah, 2007. 1

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Thevenin and J. Coutaz, “Plasticity of User Interfaces: Framework and Research Agendas”, inProceedings of Interact’99 (A. Sasse and C. Johnson, eds.), pp. 110–117, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999. 1

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Ullmer and H. Ishii,Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millenium, ch. Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 2001. 1

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. P. Fishkin, T. P. Moran, and B. L. Harrison, “Embodied User Interfaces: Toward invisible User Interfaces”, inProceedings of the IFIP TC2/TC13 WG2.7/WG13.4 Seventh Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction EHCl’98, pp. 1–18, Kluwer Academics Publishers, Deventer, 1998. 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Coutrix and L. Nigay, “Mixed Reality: A Model of Mixed Interaction”, inProceedings of International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI’2006, pp. 43–50, ACM Press, New York, 2006. 1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Sottet, G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, and J. Favre, “A Model-Driven Engineering Approach for the Usability of Plastic User Interfaces”, inProc. of Engineering Interactive Systems 2007 (IFIP WG2.7/13.4 10th Conference on Engineering Human Computer Interaction jointly organized with IFIP WG 13.2 1st Conference on Human Centred Software Engineering and DSVIS—14th Conference on Design Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems) EIS’2007 (M. B. Harning and J. Gulliksen, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 2, 8

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Paternó, C. Mancini, and S. Meniconi, “ConcurTask-Trees: A Diagrammatic Notation for Specifying Task Modelss,” inProceedings of Interact’97, pp. 362–369, Chapman & Hall, London, 1997, 2, 3, 10

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Gamboa-Rodriguez and D. L. Scapin, “Editing MAD* task descriptions for specifying user interfaces, at both semantic and presentation levels,” inProceedings of 4th International Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS’ 1997, pp. 193–208, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997, 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Myers, S. E. Hudson, and R. Pausch, “Past, Present, Future of User Interface Software Tools,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 2000, 2, 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Crystal,The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition ed., 2005, 2, 3

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Bijeljac and R. Breton,Du language aux langues. Gallimard, Paris, 1997. 2

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Pigott, “HOPL: an Interactive Roster of Programming Languages”, 2007. http://hopl.murdoch.edu.au/. 3

  16. I. Kurtev, J. Bézivin, and M. Aksit, “Technological Spaces: An Initial Appraisal”, inProceedings of the Confederated International CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2002, pp. 231–244, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 3

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Bézivin, “In Search of a Basic Principle for Model Driven Engineering”The European Journal for the Informatics Professional, vol. 2, pp. 21–24, 2004. 3

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll,Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, 2002. 3

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Berti, F. Correani, G. Mori, F. Paternó, and C. Santoro, “TERESA: A Transformation-Based Environment for Designing Multi-Device Interactive Applications,” inProceedings of ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’04, pp. 793–794, ACM, ACM Press, New York, 2004. 3, 7, 8, 10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Mens, K. Czarnecki, and P. V. Gorp, “A Taxonomy of Model Transformations”, inLanguage Engineering for Model-Driven Software Development, March 2004. 3

  21. J. M. C. Bastien and D. Scapin, “Ergonomic Criteria for the Evaluation of Human-Computer” Tech. Rep. 156, INRIA, 1993. 4, 8

  22. J. Coutaz, “Meta-User Interface for Ambient Spaces,” inProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams for UI design TAMODIA ’2006 (K. Coninx, K. Luyten, and K. Schneider, eds.), pp. 1–15, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 5

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, D. Thevenin, Q. Limbourg, L. Bouillon, and J. Vanderdonckt, “A Unifying Reference Framework for Multi-Target User Interfaces,”Interacting With Computers, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 289–308, 2003. 5, 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Vanderdonckt, E. Furtado, V. Furtado, Q. Limbourg, W. Silva, D. Rodrigues, and L. Taddeo,Multi-model and Multi-level Development of User Interfaces, ch. Multiaple User Interfaces—Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York, November 2003. 5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Vanderdonckt and F. Bodart, “Encapsulating Knowledge for Intelligent Automatic Interaction Objects Selection,” inProceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems INTERCHI’93, ACM Press, New York, 1993. 5

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Bouillon and J. Vanderdonckt, “Retargeting Web Pages to other Computing Platforms,” inProceedings of IEEE 9th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering WCRE ’2002, pp. 339–348, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 2002, 7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Paganelli and F. Paternó, “Automatic Reconstruction of the Underlying Interaction Design of Web Applications”. inProceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering SEKE’02, pp. 439–445 ACM Press, New York, 2002. 7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Bouchet and L. Nigay, “ICARE: a Component-based approach for the design and development of multimodal interfaces,” inProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’2004, pp. 1325–1328, ACM, ACM Press, New York, 2004. 7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Coutaz, L. Nigay, D. Salber, A. Blandford, J. May, and R. Young, “Four Easy Pieces for Assessing the Usability of Multimodal Interaction: The CARE properties,” inProceedings of 5th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’95 (K. Nordbyn, P. H. Helmersen, D. J. Gilmore, and S. A. Arnesen, (eds.), pp. 115–120, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995, 7, 8

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Rousseau, Y. Bellik, and F. Vernier, “Multimodal Output Specification/simulation Platform,” inProceedings of 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces ICMI’2005, pp. 84–91, ACM Press, New York, 2005. 7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Stanciulescu, Q. Limbourg, J. Vanderdonckt, B. Michotte, and F. Montero, “A Transformational Approach for Multimodal Web User Interfaces based on UsiXML”, inProceedings of 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces ICMI’2005, pp. 259–266, ACM Press, New York, 2005. 8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Beaudouin-Lafon, “Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces”, inProceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’2000, pp. 446–453, ACM, ACM Press, New York, April 2000. 8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Schaefer, S. Bleul, and W. Mueller, “Dialog modelling for multiple devices and multiple interaction modalities,” inProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams for UI design TAMODIA ’2006 (K. Coninx, K. Luyten, and K. Schneider, eds.), vol. 4385, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 8

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. Chevassus, “A Framework for authoring and exploiting multimodal documentation”, inW3C Seminar, (Toulouse, France), June 21 2005. 8

  35. T. Ziegert, M. Lauff, and L. Heuser, “Device Independent Web Applications—The Author Once—Display Everywhere Approach”, inProceedings of 4th International Conference on Web Engineering ICWE’04 (N. Koch, P. Fraternali, and M. Wirsing, eds.), vol. 3140, pp. 244–255. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. 8

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. F. Ali, M. A. Pérez-Quiñones, and M. Abrams,Multiple User Interfaces—Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces. ch. Building multi-platform user interfaces with UIML. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004. 8

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. Katsurada, Y. Nakamura, H. Yamada, and T. Nitta, “XISL: A Language for Describing Multimodal Interaction Scenarios”, inProceedings of 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces ICMI’2003, pp. 281–284, ACM Press, New York, 2003. 8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Stanciulescu and J. Vanderdonckt, “Design Options for Multimodal Web Applications,” inProc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’06, pp. 41–56, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 8

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Coyette, S. Kieffer, and J. Vanderdonckt, “Multi-Fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces,” inProceedings of 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. 8

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. A. Myers, “Creating user interfaces using programming-by-example, visual programming, and constraints,”ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 143–177, 1990. 8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Lepreux and J. Vanderdonckt, “Towards Supporting User Interface Design by Composition Rules,” inProc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’06, Industrial track, Irvine, 2002. 8

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Jouault and I. Kurtev, “Transforming Models with ATL,” inSatellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference: MoDELS 2005 International Workshops OCLWS, MoDeVA, MARTES, AOM, MTiP, WiSME, MODAUI, NfC, MDD, WUsCAM (J. M. Bruel, ed.), vol. 3844, pp. 128–138, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. 10

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Balme, A. Demeure, N. Barralon, J. Coutaz, and G. Calvary, “CAMELEON-RT: A Software Architecture Reference Model for Distributed, Migratable, and Plastic User Interfaces,” inProc. of Second European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence EUSAI’2004 (P. Markopoulos, B. Eggen, and E. Aarts, eds.), pp. 291–302, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, November 2004, 10

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Sottet, G. Calvary, J. Favre, and J. Coutaz,Megamodeling and Metamodel-Driven Engineering for Plastic User Interfaces: Mega-UI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007, 10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Sébastien Sottet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sottet, JS., Calvary, G., Coutaz, J. et al. A language perspective on the development of plastic multimodal user interfaces. J Multimodal User Interfaces 1, 1–12 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910054

Key words

Navigation