Skip to main content
Log in

The quality of e-services: Measuring satisfaction of Internet customers

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet usage is increasingly expanding, resulting to the growth of business offering Internet access to various customers. These Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are confronted with a new competitive landscape, which is characterized by a significant complexity and dynamics. This situation justifies a need for measuring customer satisfaction and analyzing factors that are able to affect customer retention. Furthermore, in order to face increasing competition, the ISPs try to fulfill individual customer expectations by diversify their service packages. This paper refers to a customer satisfaction survey for a major ISP in Greece. The analysis is based on the MUSA method, which is an ordinal regression model based on the principles of multicriteria decision analysis. The provided results are able to evaluate quantitative global and partial satisfaction levels and to determine the strong and the weak points of the ISP. Moreover, segmentation analysis is performed in order to identify the different groups of customers and estimate the homogeneity of preferences in distinguished customer segments. All these results are able to help business organization to determine specific improvement actions and develop customized services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Customers Satisfaction Council (1995). Customer satisfaction assessment guide, Motorola University Press.

  • De Ruyter J.C., Bloemer J.M.A., Peters P. (1997). “Merging Service Quality and Service Satisfaction: An Empirical Test of an Integrative Framework”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, pp. 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutka A. (1995). AMA handbook of customer satisfaction: A complete guide to research, planning and implementation, Illinois: NTC Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis E., Politis Y., Siskos Y. (2002). “Satisfaction benchmarking and customer classification: An application to the branches of a banking organization”, International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(5), pp. 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y. (2002). “Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), pp. 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y. (2003). “MUSA: A decision support system for evaluating and analysing customer satisfaction”, in: Margaritis K., Pitas I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, TEI of Thessaloniki, pp. 113–127.

  • Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y. (2004). “A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: results from the transportation-communications sector”, European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2), pp. 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y., Saurais O. (2000). “TELOS: A customer satisfaction evaluation software”, Computers and Operations Research, 27(7–8), pp. 799–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill N. (1996) Handbook of customer satisfaction measurement, Hampshire: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAP (2005). Internet services sectoral study, Athens: ICAP S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelis G., Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y., Politis Y., Malandrakis Y. (2001). “Customer satisfaction measurement in the private bank sector”, European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), pp. 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumann E., Giel K. (1995). Customer satisfaction measurement and management, Cincinnati: Thomson Executive Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis Y., Siskos Y. (2004). “Multicriteria methodology for the evaluation of a Greek engineering department”, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(1), pp. 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y., Grigoroudis E., Politis Y., Malandrakis Y. (2001). “Customer satisfaction evaluation: Some real experiences”, in: Colorni A., Paruccini M., Roy B. (eds.), A-MCD-A: Multiple criteria decision aiding, European Commission, Joint Research Center, EUR 19808 EN, pp. 297–314.

  • Siskos Y., Grigoroudis E., Zopounidis C., Saurais O. (1998). “Measuring customer satisfaction using a collective preference disaggregation model”, Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2), pp. 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y., Grigoroudis E. (2002). “Measuring customer satisfaction for various services using multicriteria analysis”, in: Bouyssou D., Jacquet-Lagrèze E., Perny P., Słlowiński R., Vanderpooten D., Vincke P. (eds.), Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: Essays in honor of Bernard Roy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 457–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng R.A., McKoy R.D. (1996). “An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction”, Journal of Retailing, 72(2), pp. 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavra T.G. (1997). Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction, Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff R.B., Gardial S.F. (1996). Know your customer: New approaches to understanding customer value and satisfaction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xanthidis D., Nicholas D. (2004). “Evaluating internet usage and e-commerce growth in Greece”, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 56(6), pp. 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyriazopoulos, P., Spyridakos, A., Grigoroudis, E. et al. The quality of e-services: Measuring satisfaction of Internet customers. Oper Res Int J 7, 233–254 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942389

Keywords

Navigation