Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the IDEA-AM (Integrated Development and Environmental Additionality — Assessment Methodology) to compare 12 real projects from the Mediterranean region

  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A project could be considered eligible under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) if it fulfils a double additionality condition: (i) an environmental additionality and (ii) a sustainable development additionality. In this framework, we hereby present the Integrated Development and Environmental Additionality Assessment Methodology (IDEA-AM), a multicriteria based methodology for the assessment of candidate CDM projects additionality and its application to selected cases from the Mediterranean region. IDEA-AM has proven to be a useful assessment tool and can become a useful aid to policy and decision-makers as they strive towards the effective application of CDM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos K., Flamos A., Askounis D., Psarras J. (2003), “The Sustainable Development Assessment System (SDAS)-A Tool Steering Towards a Cleaner Environment”, International Conference Clean Air, 7–10 July 2003, Lisbon, Portugal.

  2. Anagnostopoulos K., Flamos A., Kagiannas A., Psarras J., (2003), “The impact of Clean Development Mechanism in achieving sustainable development”, Int. J. of Environment and Pollution, Vol. 21, No. 1.

  3. An Ngo T., Mousseau V., (2002), “Using Assignment Examples to Infer Category Limits for the Electre Tri Method”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11: 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arondel C., Girardin P., (2000), “Sorting cropping systems on the basis of their impact on groundwater quality” European Journal of Operational Research; 127 (3): 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carboncredits.nl, Contracted Project (2004),http://www.senter.nl/asp/page.asp?id=i001337&alias=erupt, June 2004.

  6. Energy and Resource Institute (2001), “CDM: achieving global sustainability”, www.teriin.org/climate/cdm-gs.htm.

  7. Georgopoulou E., Sararidis Y., Mirasgedis, S., Zaimi S., Lalas D.P., (2003) “A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector” European Journal of Operational Research; 146 (1): 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly C., Helme N., (2000) “Ensuring CDM project compatibility with sustainable development goals”, Center for Clean Air.

  9. Marrakesh Accords (2001), Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh, Morocco from 29 October to 10 November 2001.

  10. Mousseau V., Figueira J., Naux J-Ph., (2001) “Using assignment examples to infer weights for Electre Tri method: some experimental results”. European Journal of Operational Research 130(2): 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mousseau V., Slowinksi R., (1998), “Inferring an Electre Tri model from assignment examples”, Journal of Global Optimization 12(2): 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mousseau V., Slowinski R., Zielniewicz P., (1999) “Electre Tri 2.0a — Methodological Guide and User’s Manual”, Laboratoire d′ analyse et modelisation de systems pour l’ aide a la decision, Unite de recherche associee, CNRS, ESA 7024, Universite Paris Dauphine.

  13. Prototype Carbon Fund, PCF Projects (2004),http://carbonfinance.org/pcf/router.cfm?Page=Proiects.

  14. Rogers M., Bruen M., (1998) “A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within Electre III”, European Journal of Operational Research 107: 552–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saleemul Huq., (2002) “A possible sustainable development assessment criteria for PCF projects”, PCFplus Fellow, Washington DC, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tibbs H. (1999) “Sustainability: The Source of the Crisis in Global Business Network” DEEPER NEWS; 10 (1).

  17. UNFCCC Methodologies (2004),http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/process ?cases=A.

  18. Zopounidis C., Michael D., (2002) “Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review”, European Journal of Operational Research 138: 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Project Design Document, “A.T. Biopower Rice Husk Power Project”, Thailand, July 2003.

  20. Project Design Document, “CDM Project Design Document of the Republic of Korea: HFCs Decomposition Project In Ulsan”, Version 2.3, June 2003.

  21. Project Design Document, “Rang Dong Oil Field Associated Gas Recovery and Utilisation Project”, Vietnam, September 2003.

  22. Project Design Document, “Methane capture and combustion from swine manure treatment for Peralillo”, Version 7, April 2004.

  23. Project Design Document, “NovaGerar Landfill Gas to Energy Project by S.A. Paulista in Nova Iguaçú, Rio de Janeiro”, Brazil. EcoSecurities Ltd., July 2003.

  24. Project Design Document, “Municipal Solid Waste Treatment cum Energy Generation Project”, Lucknow, India, September 2003.

  25. Project Design Document, “TA Sugars proposed Sugar Cogeneration plant and Fuel Switch Project”, September 2003.

  26. Project Design Document, “Durban Landfill Gas to Electricity Project in South Africa”, Revised Draft, July 2003.

  27. Project Design Document, “Mexico: El Gallo Hydroelectric Project”, September 7, 2003.

  28. Project Design Document, “Nova Gerar Landfill Gas to Energy Project”, July 2003.

  29. Project Design Document, “Vale Do Rosário Bagasse Cogeneration (VRBC): A GHG Emission Reductions Project Activity In Brazil”, Revised Version, July 2003.

  30. Project Design Document, “Graneros Plant Fuel Switching Project in Chile”, August 2003.

  31. Project Design Document “Salvador Da Bahia Landfill Gas Project”, February 2003.

  32. Project Design Document, “The Onyx Landfill Gas Recovery project at the SASA landfill in Tremembe, Brazil”, July 2003.

  33. Project Design Document, “Guatemala: El Canada Hydroelectric Project”, April, 2003.

  34. Project Design Document, “Uganda: West Nile Hydropower Project”, Final Draft, August 2001.

  35. Project Design Document, “Colombia: Jepirachi Wind Power Project”, September 2003.

  36. Project Design Document, “Chile: Chacabuquito 26 MW Run of River Hydropower Project”, March 2002.

  37. Project Design Document, “Brazil: Sustainable Fuelwood and Charcoal Production for the Pig Iron Industry in Minas Gerais. The “Plantar” Project”, March 2002.

  38. Project Design Document, “Metrogas Package Cogeneration Project, Chile”, April 2004.

  39. Project Design Document, “Bumibiopower Methane Extraction and Power Generation Project, Malaysia”, January 2004.

  40. Project Design Document, “Soil Conservation Project, Moldova”, November 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexandras, F., Kostas, A., Haris, D. et al. Application of the IDEA-AM (Integrated Development and Environmental Additionality — Assessment Methodology) to compare 12 real projects from the Mediterranean region. Oper Res Int J 4, 119–145 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943606

Keywords

Navigation