Skip to main content
Log in

Turning spreadsheets into graphs: An information technology lesson in whole brain thinking

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have Concluded that teaching undergraduate students to use spreadsheet software to analyze, interpret, and communicate spreadsheet data through a graph is an information technology exercise in whole brain thinking. In investigating why our students have difficulty constructing proper graphs, we have discovered that graphing requires two different types of thinking: analytical, logical thinking for working with data and choosing the correct type of graph, and creative, holistic thinking to construct a graph that is aesthetically pleasing and accurately communicates the meaning of the data. Common graph types and their proper usage are discussed. To improve information technology graphing, we suggest instructors teach students to fully understand the data before deciding on a message to communicate, visualize the graph before using the software to create it, and focus on the “look and feel” of the graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brasseur, L. (2001). Critiquing the culture of computer graphing practices.Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency. (2003).Theworld factbook. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factboolc/index.html

  • Cherry, C., Godwin, D., & Staples, J. (1989).Is the left brain always right?A guide to whole child development. Belmont, CA: David S. Lake.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. (1985).The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D. (2002). Left brain-right brain.Instructor, 112(2), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fact Monster. (2003) Salt lake city: 2002Winter Olympics. Final medal standings. Retrieved January 28, 2004, from http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0900268.html

  • Gardner, H. (1982).Art, mind and brain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Aviation Manufacturers Association. (2003).GAMA first quarter 2003 statistics analysis. Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.avbuyer.com/Editorial/GAMA1stQ03.pdf

  • Gordon, H. (1990). The neurobiological basis of hemisphericity. In C. Trevarthen, (Ed.).Brain circuits and functions of the mind (pp. 249–265). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, G. (1995).Graphing data: Techniques for display and analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, N. (1990).The creative brain. Lake Lure, NC: Brain Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, N. (1996).The whole brain business book. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iaccino, J. (1993).Left brain — right brain differences: Inquiries, evidence, and new approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infoplease. (2002).Top 20 selling passenger cars in the US, 1999–2001. Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://infoplease.com/ipa/A0883576.html

  • Johnson, D., Ferguson, J., & Lester, M. (2002). Computer experiences, self-efficacy and knowledge of students entering a college of agriculture.NACTA Journal, 46(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J., & Patterson, T. (2004). Simple computer graphing assignment becomes a lesson in critical thinking.NACTA Journal 48(2), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirel, B. (1998). Visualizations for data exploration and analysis: A critical review of usability research.Technical Communication, 45(4), 491–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T., Leonard, J., & Harper, W. (2001). A core curriculum for the 21st century.NACTA Journal, 45(4), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratey, J. (2002).A user’s guide to the brain: Perception, attention, and the four theaters of the brain. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, E., & McGinn, M. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice?Science Education, 81, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, C., & Schmid, S. (1979).Handbook of graphic presentation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searlman, A. (1977). A review of right hemisphere linguistic capabilities.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 503–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searlman, A. (1983). Language capabilities of the right hemisphere. In A. Young (Ed.),Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere (pp. 87–111). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1981). Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies.Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S. (1987). Left brain, right brain: Do we educate both?The Education Digest, 53(2), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S., & Deutsch, G. (1998).Left brain, right brain (5th ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1990). Editor’s preface: Roger W. Sperry’s lifework and our tribute. In C. Trevarthen (Ed.),Brain circuits and functions of the mind (xxvii–xxxvii). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1990).Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1983).The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1997).Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, J. (1996) Dare to think new.Arts & activities, 119(3), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2003).Detroit District. Great Lakes Hydrographs. Retrieved February 12, 2004, from http:www.lre.usace.army.mil.index.cfm?chn_ID= 1383& lake_id=2

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. (1998).National Statistics Service. Statistical bulletin number 946c. Final estimates 1992–1997.Value of principal vegetables for fresh market. Retrieved February 1, 2004, from http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ reports/general/sb/b9460199.txt

  • Wallgren, A., Wallgren, B., Persson, R., Jorner U., & Haaland, J.-A. (1996).Graphing statistics & data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonder, J., & Donnovan, P. (1984).Whole brain thinking: Working from both sides of the brain to achieve peak job performance. New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1983).Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, T.F., Leonard, J.G. Turning spreadsheets into graphs: An information technology lesson in whole brain thinking. J. Comput. High. Educ. 17, 95–115 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960228

Keywords

Navigation