Skip to main content
Log in

Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distance education is often used as a cost-efficient way to train employees. This research focuses on training for teaching online. A comprehensive literature review revealed the scarcity of scholarly work in this area. To determine best practices in training for teaching online, a faculty training program was examined and experts were interviewed. Both educational organizations and corporations offer online education programs, and there are enough similarities in the way in which these programs are presented to extrapolate the findings of this study to corporate training. This study found that successful online training programs are led by faculty trained to teach online. Training programs are successful when faculty have computing skills before enrolling in the training, are trained using the course delivery system with which they will be teaching, have ongoing institutional support, and are motivated to work in this environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 2002 Industry report. (2002).Training, 39(1), 24–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asirvatham, S. (2000, September-October). Beyond the distance barrier: New technology for e-training.Journal of Property Management, 43–48.

  • Barron, T. (2001, July). An e-learning industry update.Learning Circuits. Retrieved December 22, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.learningcircuits.org/ 2001/jul2001/barron.html.

  • Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (2000).Transnational management: text, cases, and readings in cross-border management (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C.J. (2002). Online training in an online world.USDLA Journal, 16(3). Retrieved March 17, 2002, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAR02_Issue/ article02.html.

  • Bower, B.L. (2001). Distance education: facing the faculty challenge.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. Retrieved March, 22, 2005, from http:// www.westga.edu/≈distance/ojdla/summer42/bower42.html.

  • Burke, N. (1998).Teaching educators to teach in their pajamas: the perils and promises of a faculty based training program Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon98/paper/burke.html.

  • Carter, A. (1995). Developing faculty training for interactive distance education.Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNN. (2004).Money 101: Glossary. Retrieved August 24, 2005, from http:// money.cnn.com/services/glossary/a.html.

  • Cook, E. (2002, February 15). Online education, online training—distant relations, or kissing cousins?Distance Education Report, pp. 4–5.

  • Cyrs, T.E. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. In T.E. Cyrs (Ed.),Teaching and learning at a distance: what it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 15–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, B. (1999). A systems approach to asynchronous distance learning: A community college model. In M. Boaz, B. Elliott, D. Foshee, D. Hardy, C. Jarmon., & D. Olcott, Jr. (Eds.),Teaching at a distance: A handbook for instructors (pp. 65–74). Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., & Shea, P. (2000). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with asynchronous teaching and learning in the SUNY learning network.Journal of Asynchronous tearning Networks, 4(3), 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger, G.A. (2003, March 4).President’s testimony to the Senate Budget and Taxation Subcommittee on Education, Business, and Administration of the Maryland General Assembly. Retrieved August 4, 2003, from http://www.umuc.edu/president/testimony/2003/2003senate.pdf.

  • Henning, N.L. (2000). A case study: experiences in developing online courses at a community college.Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(5), 1807. (UMI No. 9973595)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, L.P., & Hirsch, D. (2000). Model traning.Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(1), 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000, April).Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, T., & Telg, R. (2001, August). Going the distance: developing a model distance education faculty training program.Syllabus, 15(1), 14, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (no date).Tips for training online instructors. Unpublished article.

  • Retrieved February 26, 2003, from http://home. sprynet.com/~gkearsley/OItips.htm.

  • Klein, P. (2001, February 26). E-learning: Not just for employees anymore.Information Week, 122.

  • LaBranche, G.A. (2002, July/Augus). WWW. what’s next: e-learning.Franchising World, 52, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linial, G. (1998). Distance education.Healthcare Executive, 13(2), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M.M. (2002).The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom. New York: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantyla, K., & Gividen, J.R. (1997).Distance learning: A step-by-step guide for trainers. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallie, T., & McKinzie, L. (1999). Teaching online: a professional development model. InSITE 99: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 432247)

  • Mielke (1999, December). Effective teaching in distance education.ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436528)

  • Miles, L. (2001, February 1). Marketers warm to electronic learning.Marketing, 35.

  • Miyares, J. (2002, October 5).UMUC undergraduate students by the numbers. Presentation made at the School of Undergraduate Studies Fall General Faculity Meeting, Adelphi, MD.

  • Muirhead, B. (2002, October). Training new online teachers.USDLA Journal. Retrieved February 2, 2003, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/OCT02_Issue/article06.html.

  • Olcott, D., Jr. (1999). Instructional technologies-part two. Strategies for instructor success. In M. Boaz, B. Elliott, D. Foshee, D. Hardy, C. Jarmon & D. Olcott, Jr. (Eds.),Teaching at a distance: A handbook for instructors (pp. 31–40). Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olcott, D., & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education.The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C.A. (2002). Leadership in online education: strategies for effective online administration and governance. In K.E. Rudestam, & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.),Handbook of online learning: Innovations in higher education and corporate training (pp. 237–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2002). Beyond the looking glass: What faculty and students need to be successful online. In K. E. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), InHandbook of online learning: Innovations in higher education and corporate training (pp. 171–184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalese, E.R. (2001). What can a college distance education program do to increase persistence and decrease attrition?Journal of Instruction Delivery System, 15(3), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, L. (2001). A connected experience: A faculty development model for teaching and learning.Journal of Instruction Delivery System, 15(3), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Maryland University College. (2004a).Basic computer skills tutorial. Retrieved March 7, 2004, from http://www.umuc.edu/distance/odell/ctla/basic_skills/

  • University of Maryland University College (2004b).Faculty training and certification. Retrieved March 7, 2004, from http://www.umuc.edu/distance/odell/ctla/training.html.

  • University of Maryland University College. (2005).UMUC at a glance. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.umuc.edu/ip/umucfacts_02.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORPatricia D. Wolf is Director of Faculty and Distance Education Services for the University of Maryland University College where she oversees the departments that provide contracts for adjunct faculty, deskcopy fulfillment for faculty, and administration of proctored final exams, placement exams, and makeup testing for UMUC’s 130,000 students. Dr. Wolf also coordinates the Academic Support Program (ASP) for UMUC’s School of Undergraduate Studies. The ASP employs approximately 200 people as teaching assistants, graders, and tutors to assist UMUC faculty. Dr. Wolf is a Collegiate Associate Professor in the Information Systems Management Department of the School of Undergraduate Studies at UMUC. She completed her Master’s in business at The Johns Hopkins University and her PhD in management at UMUC. Dr. Wolf is also immediate past-president of the Maryland Distance Learning Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, P.D. Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online. J. Comput. High. Educ. 17, 47–78 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032698

Keywords

Navigation