Skip to main content
Log in

A self-study of teaching reform in a University Business Computing Course: “...it all went wrong...”

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 1991 to 1993, I conducted a qualitative investigation of the influence of open discourse on technicism in a University Business Computing Course. I discontinued the research on realizing, through a reflective self-study, that I had acted unethically. To address this breach of ethics, I conducted a psychology-oriented inquiry, from 1993 to 1996, to delve deeply, using heuristic reflection, into the nature, and possible healing, of the causes of my research short-comings both in theory and practice. The change in research approach and direction rested upon my growing awareness of the importance of art, symbolic interpretation of experience, and spirituality. In this paper, I outline background theory and reflective heuristically on both the teaching reform and its failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T, & Horkheimer, M. (1992),The dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D. (1996). Artful inquiry: A symbolic constructivist framework for social science research.Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 411–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D. (1994), Making the invisible visible: Using analogically-based methods to surface unconscious processes in organizations.Organizational Development Journal, 12(4) 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (1988). The culturaldimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of Technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (1993a).Critical essays on education, modernity, and the recovery of the ecological imperative. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (1993b).Education, cultural myths and the ecological crisis: Towards deep change. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Williams, M. (1995). The use of symbo-constructive pictures to explore the shadow side of our teaching-learning. In J. Abbott & L. Willcoxson (Eds.),Proceedings of the Forum for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 179–184). Murdoch University: Perth, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990).Soft systems methodology in practice. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1984).Song of Bernadette.

  • Davies, P. (1994).The mind of God: The scientific basic for a rational world. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1987).The post card: from Socrates to Freud and beyond. (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. (1990). Green Reason: Communicative Ethics for the Biosphere.Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, T.S. (1951).Choruses from the rocks. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1964).The technological society. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1973).The new demons. Oxford: Alden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1990).The technological bluff. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. (1988). Situational complexity, systems modelling and methodology.Transactions of the Institute of Management and Control, 10(3), 130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L., & Jackson, M.C. (1991).Creative problem solving. United Kingdom: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1971).Towards a rational society (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.). London: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and human interests (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. (1991).Problem solving in business and management. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A. (1986).Inner work: Using dreams and active imagination for personal growth. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C.G. (1968). Approaching the unconscious. In C.J. Jung (Ed.),Man and his Symbols (pp. 1–95). Aldus Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C.G. (1989)Memories, dreams, reflections (rev. ed) (R. & C. Winston, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. (1978).The abolition of man. London: Fount.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. (1979).The great divorce. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis (1945)The hideous strength. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964).One dimensional man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1969).Eros and civilisation. London: Allen Lane Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1990).Heuristic research: Design, methodology and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitzche, F. (1978).The will to power (W. Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale, Trans.). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1992). Deconstruction, postmodernism and philosophy: Habermas on Derrida. In D. Wood (Ed.),Derrida: A critical reader (pp. 167–192). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (1981).Understanding the mid-life crisis. Melbourne: Sun Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. (1992).Philosophy for beginners. NY: Writers and Readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, R. (1988). Deconstruction. In A. Bullock, O. Stallybrass & S. Trombley (Eds.),Modern Thought: (rev. ed.). Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, P. & Tobin, K. (in press). Quality control and the genress of qualitative research. In P.C. Taylor, K. Tobin, & P. Gilmer (Eds.),Sunflowers: The blooming of college and university (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Schon, D. (1983).The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, C., & Campbell Williams, M. (1993a). Methodological pluralism for managing departmental change: An interpretive action-research case study within a university information systems department. In: A. Herman & Colin Latchem (Ed.),Proceedings of the Forum for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 173–184). Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, C., & Campbell Williams, M. (1993 b).Business re-engineering from an IS perspective. Paper presented at the Information Technology Update’93 Conference, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.

  • Standing, C., & Campbell Williams, M. (1993 c). Methodological pluralism in a rapidly changing IT environment. In B. Glasson & V. Pervan (Eds.),Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Professionals Conference (pp. 23–25). Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1990).Metaphors and images in teaching (What Research Says to the Sciences and Mathematics Teachers, No. 5) Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Campbell Williams, M. (1993). Discourse towards balanced rationality in the high school mathematics classroom: Ideas from Habermas’ critical theory. In J. Malone & P. Taylor (Eds).Constructivist interpretations of teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 135–148. Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wodke, M. (1993).Mind over media: Ceative thinking skills for electronic media. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1977).Computer power and human learning. San Francisco: W. H. Freedman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mark Campbell Williams received two bachelor’s degrees in science and architecture (honors). He began his career in the architecture and building industry. After his research degrees, Dr. Williams moved into tertiary, secondary and community computing education, followed by computing consulting and training, in Australia and in the Republic of Kiribati. Dr. Williams spent nine years lecturing in management information systems and business computing at Edith Cowan University (ECU). Currently, in addition to researching, teaching, and administration, he is part of the team for the new Doctorate of Business Administration (Information Systems) at ECU, which is based around electronic commerce, co-coordinating an “Information Warfare and Security” unit, in Perth, Singarpore, and Hong Kong. His research interests are in the use of soft systems methodology in education and management and information systems practice, the self-study of teaching practice and professional practice, symbolic interpretationer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, M.C. A self-study of teaching reform in a University Business Computing Course: “...it all went wrong...”. J. Comput. High. Educ. 12, 31–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032713

Keywords

Navigation