Abstract
WITH THE PROLIFERATION OF EPORTFOLIOS and their organizational uses in higher education, it is important for educators and other relevant stakeholders to understand the student perspective. The way students view and use ePortfolios are revealing elements to aid educators in the successful integration of ePortfolio systems. This research describes the development of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument (EPSPI) and initial validation (N=204) efforts in the context of an ePortfolio initiative in a College of Education. The EPSPI incorporates four domains from a student perspective: employment, visibility, assessment, and learning; and connects those domains with four relevant stakeholders: students, administrators, faculty, and employers. Descriptive analyses, exploratory factor analysis, and a qualitative analysis using grounded theory were used. Results indicate that student perspectives towards ePortfolios are multidimensional with three distinct, internally consistent underlying constructs: learning, assessment, and visibility. Qualitative analysis revealed four interrelated themes from a student perspective: system characteristics, support structure, purpose, and personal impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Arrindell, W.A., & Van der Ender, J. (1985). Cross-sample invariance of the structure of self-reported distress and difficulty in assertiveness.Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 205–243.
Barrett, H.C. (2003). Electronic portfolios. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.),Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Barrett, H.C. (2005). Researching electronic portfolio and learner engagement.White paper. The Reflect Initiative.
Bartlett, A. (2002). Preparing preservice techers to implement performance assessment and technology through electronic portfolios.Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 90–97.
Chalk and Wire Learning Assessment, Inc. (2006).Chalk and Wire Web-Based Protfolio System. Retrieved on August 12, 2006, from http://www.chalkandwire.com/
Curts, J., Yanes, J., & McWright, B. (2003). Assessment of preservice teachers' Web-based electronic portfolio.Education Technology for Teacher Preparation and Certification, 92–98. Retrieved July 25, 2006. from http://www.nesinc.com/PDFs/2003_11Curts.pdf
Gibson, D. (2006). ePortfolio decisions and dilemmas. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.).Handbook of research in eportfolio. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W.F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.
Jacobsen, M., & Spiro, R. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301–333.
Jafari, A. (2004). The “sticky” eportfolio system: Tackling challenges & identifying attributes.Educause Review, 39(4), 38–48.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity.Pschometrika, 39, 31–36.
Kerlinger, F. (1974).Foundations of behavioural research. New York: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.
Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of ePortfolios.Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf
Meeus, W., Questier, & Derks, T. (2006). Opensource eportfolio: Development and implementation of an institution-wide electronic platform for students.Educational Media International, 43(2), 133–145.
Nunnally, J. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O'Hara, M.T., Watson, R.T., & Kavan, C.B. (1999). Managing the three levels of change.Information Systems Management Journal 16(3), 63–70.
Ritzhaupt, A.D., & Singh, O. (2006, March).Student perspectives of ePortfolios in computing education. Proceedings of the Association of Computing Machinery Southeast Conference, Melbourne, FL, 152–157.
Salzman, S., Denner, P., & Harris, L. (2002).Teaching education outcomes measures: Special study survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New York, NY.
Siemens, G. (2005). EPortfolios.E-Learning News. 1(2). ASTD. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.astd.org/astd/Publications/Newsletters/elearn_news/2005/Feb/siemens.htm
SPSS (2006).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Retrieved on August 12, 2006, from: http://www.spss.com/
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Issues of initiation and implementation.Journal of Research in Technology Education, 37(4), 411–433.
Villano, M. (2007, March 1). Assessment technology.Campus Technology. Retrieved April 30, 2007. from http://www.campustechnology/article.aspx?aid=45245
Wheeler, B.C., (2003).ePortfolio project. Open Source ePortfolio Release 2.0, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Retrieved June 27, 2005, from https://eportfolio.vt.edu/ospi_mellon_proposal.pdf
Williams, M., Wetzel, K., & Wilhelm, L. (2004). Trials and tribulations of reflective practices in preservice teacher electronic protfolios. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, & D. Willis. (Eds.).Technology and teacher education annual (pp. 301–306) Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Wright, V., Stallworth, B., & Ray, B. (2002). Challenges of electronic portfolios: Student perceptions and experiences.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10(1), 49–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHORS Albert D. Ritzhaupt, Oma Singh andThelma Seyferth are PhD candidates in the instructional technology program at the University of South Florida. Ritzhaupt is an instructor of computer information systems and currently conducts research in computing education, technology integration in educational environments, and multimedia learning environments. Singh's research interests are in design-based methods to analyze development and validation of online learning modules, and instructional technology with a focus on secondary and adult education. Seyferth has served as a key integrator in the ePortfolio initiative since its inception and is actively engaged in educational research. He also serves as a help desk manager for the ePortfolio system.
Robert F. Dedrick is Associate Professor in Educational Measurement and Research at the University of South Florida, and conducts research in the use of structural equation modeling to examine measurement quality of psychological instruments, the analysis of change using hierarchical linear modeling, and mentoring in doctoral education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ritzhaupt, A.D., Singh, O., Seyferth, T. et al. Development of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument: An ePortfolio integration initiative. J. Comput. High. Educ. 19, 47–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033426