Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument: An ePortfolio integration initiative

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

WITH THE PROLIFERATION OF EPORTFOLIOS and their organizational uses in higher education, it is important for educators and other relevant stakeholders to understand the student perspective. The way students view and use ePortfolios are revealing elements to aid educators in the successful integration of ePortfolio systems. This research describes the development of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument (EPSPI) and initial validation (N=204) efforts in the context of an ePortfolio initiative in a College of Education. The EPSPI incorporates four domains from a student perspective: employment, visibility, assessment, and learning; and connects those domains with four relevant stakeholders: students, administrators, faculty, and employers. Descriptive analyses, exploratory factor analysis, and a qualitative analysis using grounded theory were used. Results indicate that student perspectives towards ePortfolios are multidimensional with three distinct, internally consistent underlying constructs: learning, assessment, and visibility. Qualitative analysis revealed four interrelated themes from a student perspective: system characteristics, support structure, purpose, and personal impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Arrindell, W.A., & Van der Ender, J. (1985). Cross-sample invariance of the structure of self-reported distress and difficulty in assertiveness.Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 205–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H.C. (2003). Electronic portfolios. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.),Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H.C. (2005). Researching electronic portfolio and learner engagement.White paper. The Reflect Initiative.

  • Bartlett, A. (2002). Preparing preservice techers to implement performance assessment and technology through electronic portfolios.Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk and Wire Learning Assessment, Inc. (2006).Chalk and Wire Web-Based Protfolio System. Retrieved on August 12, 2006, from http://www.chalkandwire.com/

  • Curts, J., Yanes, J., & McWright, B. (2003). Assessment of preservice teachers' Web-based electronic portfolio.Education Technology for Teacher Preparation and Certification, 92–98. Retrieved July 25, 2006. from http://www.nesinc.com/PDFs/2003_11Curts.pdf

  • Gibson, D. (2006). ePortfolio decisions and dilemmas. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.).Handbook of research in eportfolio. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W.F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, M., & Spiro, R. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, A. (2004). The “sticky” eportfolio system: Tackling challenges & identifying attributes.Educause Review, 39(4), 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity.Pschometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. (1974).Foundations of behavioural research. New York: Holt, Rienhart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of ePortfolios.Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf

  • Meeus, W., Questier, & Derks, T. (2006). Opensource eportfolio: Development and implementation of an institution-wide electronic platform for students.Educational Media International, 43(2), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, M.T., Watson, R.T., & Kavan, C.B. (1999). Managing the three levels of change.Information Systems Management Journal 16(3), 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A.D., & Singh, O. (2006, March).Student perspectives of ePortfolios in computing education. Proceedings of the Association of Computing Machinery Southeast Conference, Melbourne, FL, 152–157.

  • Salzman, S., Denner, P., & Harris, L. (2002).Teaching education outcomes measures: Special study survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New York, NY.

  • Siemens, G. (2005). EPortfolios.E-Learning News. 1(2). ASTD. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.astd.org/astd/Publications/Newsletters/elearn_news/2005/Feb/siemens.htm

  • SPSS (2006).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Retrieved on August 12, 2006, from: http://www.spss.com/

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Issues of initiation and implementation.Journal of Research in Technology Education, 37(4), 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villano, M. (2007, March 1). Assessment technology.Campus Technology. Retrieved April 30, 2007. from http://www.campustechnology/article.aspx?aid=45245

  • Wheeler, B.C., (2003).ePortfolio project. Open Source ePortfolio Release 2.0, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Retrieved June 27, 2005, from https://eportfolio.vt.edu/ospi_mellon_proposal.pdf

  • Williams, M., Wetzel, K., & Wilhelm, L. (2004). Trials and tribulations of reflective practices in preservice teacher electronic protfolios. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, & D. Willis. (Eds.).Technology and teacher education annual (pp. 301–306) Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, V., Stallworth, B., & Ray, B. (2002). Challenges of electronic portfolios: Student perceptions and experiences.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Dieter Ritzhaupt.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORS Albert D. Ritzhaupt, Oma Singh andThelma Seyferth are PhD candidates in the instructional technology program at the University of South Florida. Ritzhaupt is an instructor of computer information systems and currently conducts research in computing education, technology integration in educational environments, and multimedia learning environments. Singh's research interests are in design-based methods to analyze development and validation of online learning modules, and instructional technology with a focus on secondary and adult education. Seyferth has served as a key integrator in the ePortfolio initiative since its inception and is actively engaged in educational research. He also serves as a help desk manager for the ePortfolio system.

Robert F. Dedrick is Associate Professor in Educational Measurement and Research at the University of South Florida, and conducts research in the use of structural equation modeling to examine measurement quality of psychological instruments, the analysis of change using hierarchical linear modeling, and mentoring in doctoral education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritzhaupt, A.D., Singh, O., Seyferth, T. et al. Development of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument: An ePortfolio integration initiative. J. Comput. High. Educ. 19, 47–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033426

Keywords