Skip to main content
Log in

Searching for computational creativity

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
New Generation Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Boden’s1,2) philosophical account of creativity has been criticised on the grounds that it does not properly capture some aspects of creative situations.5) Wiggins13) has presented a formalisation of Boden’s account, which allows such issues to be examined more precisely. We explore the relationship between traditional AI search methods and Boden’s abstraction of creative behaviour, and revisit Bundy’s argument in the context of that exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boden, M.,The Creative Mind, Abacus, 1990.

  2. Boden, M., “Creativity and Artificial Intelligence,”Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1998.

  3. Boden, M., “Evaluating Creativity,” Unpublished Keynote Talk at the AISB Convention, Edinburgh, 1999.

  4. Buchanan, B., “Creativity at the Meta-level,”Al Magazine, 2000. Reprint of keynote lecture to AAAI-2000.

  5. Bundy, A., “What is the Difference between Real Creativity and Mere Novelty?,”Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1994.

  6. Machado, P., Dias, A. and Cardoso, A., “Learning to Colour Greyscale Images,”AISB Journal, 1, 2, pp. 209–219, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masters, J. and Güngördü, Z., “Structured Knowledge Source Integration: A Progress Report,” inIntegration of Knowledge Intensive Multiagent Systems, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

  8. Minsky, M., “The Puzzle Principle,” inThe Society of Mind (Minsky, M., ed.), Simon and Schuster, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchie, G.D., “Assessing Creativity,”Proceedings of the AISB’01 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science (Wiggins, G.A., ed.) AISB, 2001.

  10. Ritchie, G.D. and Hanna, F.K., “AM: A Case Study in AI Methodology,”Artificial Intelligence, 23, pp. 249–268, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell, S. and Norvig, P.,Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Turing, A., “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem,”Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2, 42, pp. 230–265, 1936.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiggins, G.A., “A Preliminary Framework for Description, Analysis and Comparison of Creative Systems,” to appear inJournal of Knowledge Based Systems, in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraint A. Wiggins.

Additional information

Geraint A. Wiggins, Ph.D.: He is Professor of Computational Creativity at Goldsmiths College, University of London. He graduated in Mathematics and Computer Sciences at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge in 1984 and subsequently conducted doctoral research in Computational Lingusitics at the former Department of Artificial Intelligence of the University of Edinburgh, being awarded his Ph.D. in 1991. He currently leads the Intelligent Sound and Music Systems group at Goldsmiths. Geraint’s research is focused on the study of human musical creativity through computational methods. Current projects include completion of a second Ph.D. in musical composition and co-edition, with Dr Irène Deliège, of a new anthology of the field: “Musical Creativity: current research in theory and practice”.

About this article

Cite this article

Wiggins, G.A. Searching for computational creativity. New Gener Comput 24, 209–222 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037332

Keywords

Navigation