Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for ICAI systems based on inductive inference and logic programming

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
New Generation Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main components of an Intelligent Computer-Assisted Instruction (ICAI) system are the expertise, the student model and tutoring strategies. The student model manages what the student dose and dose not understand, and the performance of an ICAI system depends largely on how well the student model approximates the human student. We propose a new framework for ICAI systems which uses the inductive inference for constructing the student model from the student’s behavior. In the framework, both the expertise and the student model are represented as Prolog programs, which enables to express the meta-knowledge that is the knowledge of how to use the knowledge. Since the construction of the student models is performed independently of the expertise, the framework is domain-independent. Therefore, an ICAI system for any subject area can be built with the framework. As an example, the ICAI system teaching chemical reaction is presented together with a sample performance. The authors believe that the new framework for ICAI systems based on logic programming and inductive inference could be a breakthrough of the future ICAI systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carbonell, J. R., “AI in CAI: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Computer-Aided Instruction,”IEEE Trans. Man-Mach. Syst., Vol. MMS-11, No. 4, pp. 190–202, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr, A. and Feigenbaum, E. A.,The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II, PITMAN, London, pp. 225–235, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clocksin, W. F. and Mellish, C. S.,Programming in Prolog, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Angluin, D. and Smith, C. H., “Inductive Inference: Theory and Methods,”ACM Comput. Surv., Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 237–269, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Clancey, W. J., “Tutoring Rules for Guiding a Case Method Dialogue,” inIntelligent Tutoring Systems (Sleeman, D. et al. ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 201–225, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J. S. and Burton, R. R., “Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills,”Cognitive Science, 2, pp. 155–192, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro, E. Y.,Algorithmic Program Debugging, MIT Press, London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sleeman, D. and Hendley, R. J., “ACE: A System Which Analyses Complex Explanations,” inIntelligent Tutoring Systems (Sleeman, D. et al. ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 99–118, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ganke, M. et al., “An ICAI System for Prolog Programming Based on Inductive Inference,”Proc. of 28th National Conference of Information Processing Society of Japan, 1G-1, Tokyo, [in Japanese], 1984.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kawai, K., Mizoguchi, R., Kakusho, O. et al. A framework for ICAI systems based on inductive inference and logic programming. New Gener Comput 5, 115–129 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037461

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037461

Keywords

Navigation