Zusammenfassung
Die Analyse von Wegauskünften gibt wertvolle Hinweise zur Untersuchung der Zusammenhänge zwischen Sprache und Raumkognition. Diese Forschungsrichtung untersucht das theoretisch wichtige Zusammenspiel zwischen verschiedenen Systemen kognitiver Repräsentation mit unterschiedlichen funktionalen Eigenschaften. Zudem bietet dieser Bereich eine einzigartige Chance für kooperative Forschung seitens der Psychologie, Linguistik, Informatik und Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, um durch ein tieferes Verständnis der kognitiven Prozesse zum Entwurf besserer Navigationssysteme beizutragen, die den kognitiven Fähigkeiten ihrer Benutzer angepaßt sind. Der Beitrag skizziert die kognitiven Prozesse beim Zustandekommen von Wegauskünften und identifiziert invariante Merkmale von Wegbeschreibungen in der Vielfalt protokollierter individueller Äußerungen. In natürlicher Umgebung gesammelte Daten wurden analysiert und zur Erstellung von „Skelettbeschreibungen“ genutzt, die nur das enthalten, was zur Navigation entlang einer Route nötig ist. Der funktionelle Wert dieser Beschreibungen wurde gemäß ihrer Brauchbarkeit zur Navigation in unbekannten Umgebungen ermittelt.
Abstract
The analysis of route directions provides a relevant context for the study of relationships between language and spatial cognition. This research examines the theoretical issue of the cooperation between differing cognitive representational systems possessing contrasting functional properties. In addition, this research domain offers a unique opportunity for psychology, linguistics, computer science, and human-machine communication to work together, thereby contributing to the understanding of cognitive processes and improving the design of navigational systems adjusted to the cognitive capacities of their users. This paper outlines the cognitive operations involved in producing route directions and identifies certain invariant features of route descriptions beyond the diversity of individual protocols. Data collected in natural environments were analyzed and used to construct “skeletal descriptions” that reflected the essentials needed for navigating along a route. The functional value of these descriptions was assessed by their ability to guide navigation in unfamiliar environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M.F. (Eds.) (1996). Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Briffault, X. & Denis, M. (1996). Multimodal interactions between drivers and co-drivers: An analysis of on-board navigational dialogues. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Second Workshop on Representation and Processing of Spatial Expressions, Budapest, August 1996.
Bryant, D.J. (1997). Representing space in language and perception. Mind and Language 12, 239–264.
Chown, E., Kaplan, S. & Kortenkamp, D. (1995). Prototypes, location and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping. Cognitive Science 19, 1–51.
Cornell, E. H., Heth, C.D. & Alberts, D.M. (1994). Place recognition and way finding by children and adults. Memory and Cognition 22, 633–643.
Daniel, M.-P., Carité, L. & Denis, M. (1996). Modes of linearization in the description of spatial configurations. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 297–318). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Denis, M. (1996). Strategies for the description of spatial networks: Extending Levelt’s paradigm to new situational contexts. Psychologische Beiträge 38, 465–483.
Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition 16, 409–458.
Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Bertolo, L. (in press). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
de Vega, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21, 373–385.
Galea, L.A.M. & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in routelearning. Personality and Individual Differences 14, 53–65.
Gapp, K.-P. & Maass, W. (1994). Spatial layout identification and incremental description. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Workshop “Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing” (pp. 145–152), Seattle, WA, August 1994.
Golding, J. M., Graesser, A.C. & Hauselt, J. (1996). The process of answering direction-giving questions when someone is lost on a university campus: The role of pragmatics. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10, 23–39.
Golledge, R.G., Klatzky, R.L. & Loomis, J.M. (1996). Cognitive mapping and wayfinding by adults without vision. In J. Portugali (ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 215–246). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gopal, S. & Smith, T.R. (1990). Human wayfinding in an urban environment: A performance analysis of a computational process model. Environment and Planning 22, 169–191.
Habel, C. (1987). Cognitive linguistics: The processing of spatial concepts. TA Informations 28(2), 21–56.
Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, W. (1982). Local deixis in route directions. In R.J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 161–182). Chichester: Wiley.
Kuipers, B. (1978). Modeling spatial knowledge. Cognitive Science 2, 129–153.
Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W. A., Verdi, M.P., Rittschof, K.A., & Savenye, W. (1993). Why maps improve memory for text: The influence of structural information on working memory operations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 5, 375–392.
Landau, B. & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 217–265.
Levelt, W. J.M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (Eds.), Processes, beliefs, and questions (pp. 199–220). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Robin, F. & Denis, M. (1991). Description of perceived or imagined spatial networks. In R.H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. 141–152). Amsterdam: North- Holland.
Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D. & Wonsiewicz, S.A. (1985). How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 22, 549–562.
Taylor, H.A. & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 261–292.
Thorndyke, P.W. & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14, 560–589.
Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27) (pp. 109–145). New York: Academic Press.
Wunderlich, D. & Reinelt, R. (1982). How to get there from here. In R.J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 183–201). Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported in this article was supported by the CNRS (Cogniscience Program, National Thematic Project on the Representation of Space) and a Human Capital and Mobility grant (#CHRXCT940509) from the Commission of the European Communities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniel, MP., Denis, M. Spatial Descriptions as Navigational Aids: A Cognitive Analysis of Route Directions. Kognit. Wiss. 7, 45–52 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354963
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354963