Skip to main content

Logspace verifiers, NC, and NP

Extended abstract

  • Session 3A
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Computations (ISAAC 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1004))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

We explore the connection between public-coin interactive proof systems with logspace verifiers and \(\mathcal{N}\mathcal{C}\)using two different approaches. In the first approach, we describe an interactive proof system for accepting any language in \(\mathcal{N}\mathcal{C}\)after a logspace reduction, where the verifier is logspace-bounded and the protocol requires polylog time. These results are proved by describing \(\mathcal{N}\mathcal{C}\)computations as computations over arithmetic circuits using maximum and average gates, and then translating the arithmetic circuits into interactive proof systems in a natural way. In the second approach, we give a characterization of \(\mathcal{N}\mathcal{C}\)in terms of interactive proof systems where the verifier is logspace-bounded and runs in polylog time. The equivalent interactive proof systems work with error-correcting encodings of inputs, using the polylogarithmically checkable codes introduced in the context of transparent proofs.

We also characterize \(\mathcal{N}\mathcal{C}\)and \(\mathcal{P}\mathcal{S}\mathcal{P}\mathcal{A}\mathcal{C}\mathcal{E}\)via public-coin interactive proof systems where the verifier is logspace-bounded, but has restricted access to auxiliary storage.

Work done while the author was with the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Madras 600 113, India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Babai. Trading group theory for randomness. In Proc. 17th STOC, pp 421–429, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Babai and K. Friedl. On slightly superlinear transparent proofs. Technical Report CS-93-13, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, L.A. Levin, and M. Szegedy. Checking computations in polylogarithmic time. In Proc. 23rd STOC, pp 21–31, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Babai and S. Moran. Arthur-Merlin games: a randomized proof system and a hierarchy of complexity classes. J. Comp. Syst. Sci., 36:254–276, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Condon and R. Ladner. Probabilistic game automata. J. Comp. Syst. Sci., 36(3):452–489, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Condon and R. Lipton. On the complexity of space-bounded interactive proofs. In Proc. 30th FOCS, pp 462–467, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Condon and R. Ladner. Interactive proof systems with polynomially bounded strategies. In Proc. 7th Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory, pp 282–294, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Condon. The complexity of the max word problem and the power of one-way interactive proof systems. In Proc. 8th STACS, pp 456–465, 1991. LNCS 480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fortnow and C. Lund. Interactive proof systems and alternating timespace complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 113:55–73, 1993. also in Proc. 8th STACS 1991, LNCS 480.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Fortnow. Complexity-theoretic aspects of interactive proof systems. PhD thesis, M. I. T., May 1989. Tech. Rep. MIT/LCS/TR-447.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. In Proc. 17th STOC, pp 291–304, 1985. full version in SIAM J. Comput., Vol 18(1), pp 186–208.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Goldwasser and M. Sipser. Private coins versus public coins in interactive proof systems. In Proc. 18th STOC, 1986. also in Advances in Computing Research 5: Randomness and Computation, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Jenner and B. Kersig. Characterizing the polynomial hierarchy by alternating auxiliary pushdown automata. RAIRO Theoretical Informatics and Applications, 23:93–99, 1989. also in Proc. STACS(1988), LNCS 294 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Lund, L. Fortnow, H. Karloff, and N. Nisan. Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. J. ACM, 39(4):859–868, October 1992. also in Proc. 31st FOCS 1990, pp 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Lipton. Efficient checking of computations. In Proc. 7th STACS, pp 207–215, 1990. LNCS 415.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.L. Ruzzo. On uniform circuit complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 22:365–383, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Shamir. IP=PSPACE. J. ACM, 39(4):869–877, 1992. also in Proc. 31st FOCS 1990, pp 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Shen. IP=PSPACE: Simplified proof. J. ACM, 39(4):878–880, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Vinay and V. Chandru. The expressibility of nondeterministic auxiliary stack automata and its relation to treesize bounded alternating auxiliary pushdown automata. In Proc. 10th FST & TCS, pp 104–114, 1990. LNCS 472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John Staples Peter Eades Naoki Katoh Alistair Moffat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lokam, S.V., Mahajan, M., Vinay, V. (1995). Logspace verifiers, NC, and NP. In: Staples, J., Eades, P., Katoh, N., Moffat, A. (eds) Algorithms and Computations. ISAAC 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0015408

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0015408

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60573-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47766-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics