Abstract
It has been demonstrated that the use of suitable metaphors in the user service interface can have a dramatic effect on the way in which the user perceives the services, depending on the category of metaphor chosen. An earlier paper by the authors postulated that interactional metaphors might lead to greater long term usage of services, as they direct the user to thinking about what the services are for, rather than thinking about the services themselves. To test this hypothesis, a model of usage was built, showing the likely impact of using different types of metaphor. The model showed that usage levels over time varied according to metaphor category. These usage patterns were then imposed on existing techno-economic models from specific industry sectors. Interactional metaphors led to the highest long term usage in most industry sectors, although the construction industry showed higher usage with spatial metaphors. In all sectors, inappropriate choice of metaphor would be sufficient to destroy the economic advanatages of advanced communications services.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, B; Smyth M; Knott, R.P; Bergan, J; Bergan, M. & Alty, J.L. “Minimising Conceptual Baggage: Making Choices about Metaphor”, proc HCI'94, Cambridge University Press, 1994
Condon, Chris “Networked Cooperative Work: Usability Issues of MILAN”, proc Telematics '90, BIBA, Bremen, Germany, 3–5 Dec 1990
Condon, Chris, “Multimedia & CSCW in Manufacturing: Working with MILAN” proc Conferencia ESPRIT: CIME & Competividad Empressarial, Bilbao, 1992
Condon, Chris & Keuneke, Stephan “Metaphors and Layers of Signification: The Consequences for Advanced User Service Interfaces” in “Towards a Pan-European Telecommunications Service Infrastructure — IS&N 94”, ed H-J Kugler, A Mullery, N Niebert. Springer-Verlag. 1994. pp 75–88
Duin, Heiko & Kiessling. Silvia “CRIMP for Windows 3.1 User Manual”, BIBA, 1994
Duin, H. “Object-Oriented Scenario Management for Simulation Models” To be presented on: IMACS European Simulation Meeting on Simulation Tools and Applications, 28–30 August, 1995, Gyor, Hungary
Eurostat, “Enterprises in Europe”, Second Report, Commission of the European Communities
Gordon, T. J., Hayward, H. “Initial Experiments with the Cross Impact Matrix Method of Forecasting”, Futures, December 1968, S. 100–116
Hämmäinen, Heikki “Form-based Approach to Distributed Co-operative Work” PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Helsinki University of Technology, 1991
Hämmäinen, Heikki & Condon, Chris “Form and Room: Metaphors for Groupware”, proc COCS '91, ACM Conference on Organizational Computer Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, 5–8 Nov 1991
Helmer, O. “Problems in Futures Research: Delphi and Causal Cross-Impact Analysis”, Futures, February 1977, S. 17–31
Hutchins, E. “Metaphors for Interface Design” in Taylor, M.M. Neél, F. & Bouwhuis, D.G. (eds) “The Structure of Multimodal Dialogues, Elsevier: North Holand. 1989. pp11–28
Hutchinson, Chris & Rosenberg, Duska “Cooperation and Conflict in Knowledge-Intensive Computer Supported Cooperative Work” in “CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict?” Springer-Verlag, London 1993
Kane, J. “A Primer for a New Cross-Impact Language — KSIM”, Technological Forecasting and Social Changes 4, 1972, S. 129–142
Krauth, J., Hamacher, B., Duin, H. “A Set of Tools for Rough Enterprise Modelling”, Proc CISS (First Joint Conference of Simulation Societies), 1994
Laurel, Brenda “Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character” in B. Laurel (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design Addison-Wesley 1990
Sinnigen, Marita; Cools, Jan-Pieter & Sampera, Jaume “URSA Deliverable 5” RACE Project R2091, 1994
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Condon, C., Keuneke, S. (1995). Counting the costs and benefits of metaphor. In: Clarke, A., Campolargo, M., Karatzas, N. (eds) Bringing Telecommunication Services to the People — IS&N '95. IS&N 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 998. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016961
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016961
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60479-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47618-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive