Abstract
The urgent need for configuration management was recognized in applying process management in an industrial context. We considered it an marginal problem as long as we were working with a process management prototype which focused very much on the basic process management support, i.e. modeling, analysis, enaction. Based on this experience, we strongly believe that support for further marginal activities, e.g. application data import and export, evolution of application data, migration of legacy system data to process management solutions, easily can turn out to be key success factors (or, if not available, major roadblocks). Configuration management is one area where tool support is urgently needed. Only if appropriate support is provided, the promised benefits of process management will be exploitable in industrial software development.
The discussed problems of configuration management for process models have been experienced in the scope of a business process management project [5]. In this project a set of interconnected process models has been delivered to five customers. Each of these customers modified parts of these process models, three of them nontheless wanted to benefit from later process model releases. In this project we learned that manual solutions to the configuration management problem are error-prone and labour-intensive. For the time being, a set of tools supporting rudimentary configuration management for process models have been implemented. Due to the enormous problems with static process model modifications, we did not tackle configuration management problems of dynamic modifications.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S.C. Bandinelli, A. Fuggetta, and C. Ghezzi. Software Process Model Evolution in the SPADE Environment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(12), December 1993.
F. Cattaneo, A. Fugetta, and L. Lavazza. An Experience in Process Assessment. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 115–122, Seattle, Washington, US, April 1995.
J. Cramer. The Development of a Certified Business Process Model. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 1(1):27–33, September 1995.
V. Gruhn, C. Pahl, and M. Wever. Data Model Evolution as a Basis of Business Process Management. In OOER95: Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modeling, pages 270–281, Gold Coast, Australia, December 1995. Springer, Berlin. Appeared as Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1021.
V. Gruhn and S. Wolf. Software Process Improvement by Business Process Orientation. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 1:49–56, August 1995. Pilot Issue.
M.M. Lehman. The Role of Process Models in Software and Systems Development and Evolution. In Proceedings of the 5th International Software Process Workshop, Kennebunkport, Maine, USA, September 1989.
L.B. Strader, M.K. Aune, J.A. Rodgers, and M.A. Beims. Space Shuttle Onboard Software (OBS) Development and Maintenance Process Automation. In W. Schäfer, editor, Software Process Technology — Proceedings of the 4th European Software Process Modeling Workshop, pages 55–59, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, April 1995. Springer. Appeared as Lecture Notes in Computer Science 913.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gruhn, V. (1996). Configuration management support for software process models. In: Montangero, C. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017739
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017739
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61771-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70676-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive