Skip to main content

Yes/no questions with negation: Towards integrating semantics and pragmatics

  • Technical Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
GWAI-92: Advances in Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 671))

  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

Yes/no questions with negation show that pragmatic considerations enter in the analysis of linguistic form: the negation marker in sentences like “Don't you appreciate computational linguistics?” cannot be interpreted in terms of a logical operator. Rather, it indicates the speaker's bias towards a positive or negative answer to the positive form of the question. German has a special particle “doch” instead of the usual agreeing “ja” for an unexpected positive answer.

We propose a treatment within the constraint-based approach developed by Fenstad et al. (1987). They suggest to gather information from various linguistic levels in a common “constraint pool”. Our contribution concerns a pragmatic level.

Taking the formalism of LFG (Bresnan 1982) as our basis, we sketch for a tiny fragment of German yes/no questions with negation how the interaction between syntax, semantics and pragmatics is feasible within a single framework and that the different levels can still be treated separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J. Natural Language Understanding. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Perry, J. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. and Steel, T. The Logic of Questions and Answers. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J., ed. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. Studien zur Syntax und Semantik von Frage und Antwort. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyvik, H. The PONS Project: Features of a Translation System. University of Bergen. Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics, Skriftserie Nr. 39, Serie B, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstad, J. E., Halvorsen, P.-K., Langholm, T. and Van Benthem, J. Situations, Language and Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, P.-K. “Natural Language Understanding and Montague Grammar,” in: Computational Intelligence 1986 (2), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, G. and Buscha, J. Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Leipzig, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen. München: Fink, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, J. Manual für das Bielefelder LFG-System. Universität Bielefeld, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löbner, S. Wahr neben Falsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marburger, H. Generierung kooperativer natürlichsprachlicher Antworten in einem Dialogsystem mit Zugang zu relationalen Datenbanken. Dissertation. Universität des Saarlandes. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C. and Sag, I. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes 13. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, E. “Question-Answering Systems” in: Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 13–15, Chicago, 1973, 482–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restan, P. Sintaksis voprositel'nogo predlozenija. Universitetsforlaget Oslo-Bergen-Tromsö, Moskau, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, C. “Zur Theorie der Fragesätze” in: Probleme und Fortschritte der Transformationsgrammatik. Referate des 4. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Berlin, 6.–10. Okt. 1969, München 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. Entscheidungsfragen mit Negation: semantisch-pragmatische überlegungen im Rahmen des Situationsschemata-Ansatzes. Bielefeld, 1991. KI-NRW 91–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. Eine Fragetypologie für NALOG: die linguistische Perspektive und Verarbeitungsgesichtspunkte. Bielefeld, 1991. KI-NRW 91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. Forschungsvorhaben NALOG: Erstellen und Verarbeiten von Situationsschemata. Bielefeld, 1990. KI-NRW 90–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurmair, M. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestre, E. J. Representasjon av direkte spØrsmål. Cand. Scient. thesis. University of Oslo. 1987. (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestre, E. J. and Fenstad, J. E. Representing Direct Questions. University of Oslo, Dept. of Mathematics, COSMOS-Report 4, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hans Jürgen Ohlbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schulz, M., Schmidt, D. (1993). Yes/no questions with negation: Towards integrating semantics and pragmatics. In: Jürgen Ohlbach, H. (eds) GWAI-92: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 671. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0019009

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0019009

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56667-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47626-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics