Skip to main content

Application of inductive logic programming to discover rules governing the three-dimensional topology of protein structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1446))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) has been applied to discover rules governing the three-dimensional topology of protein structure. The data-set unifies two sources of information; SCOP and PROMOTIF. Cross-validation results for experiments using two background knowledge sets, global (attribute-valued) and constitutional (relational), are presented. The application makes use of a new feature of Progol4.4 for numeric parameter estimation. At this early stage of development, the rules produced can only be applied to proteins for which the secondary structure is known. However, since the rules are insightful, they should prove to be helpful in assisting the development of taxonomic schemes. The application of ILP to fold recognition represents a novel and promising approach to this problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Muggleton, R. King, and M. J. E. Sternberg. Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. Protein Engineering, 5(7):647–657, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. E. Sternberg, R. D. King, R. A. Lewis, and S. Muggleton. Application of machine learning to structural molecular biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences, 344(1310):365–71, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Fischer and D. Eisenberg. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Science, 5:947–955, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. B. Russell, M. A. S. Saqi, P. A. Bates, R. A. Sayle, and M. J. E. Sternberg. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds-assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Engineering, 11(1):1–9, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. H. Bryant. Evaluation of threading specificity and accuracy.Proteins, 26(2):172–185, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. J. Hubbard and J. Park. Fold recognition and ab initio structure predictions using hidden markov models and beta-strand pair potentials. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 23(3):398–402, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Francesco, Di, J. Garnier, and P. J. Munson. Protein topology recognition from secondary structure sequences: Application of the hidden markov models to the alpha class proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 267(2):446–463, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Rost, R. Schneider, and C. Sander. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. Journal of Molecular Biology, 270:471–480, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Dubchak, I. Muchnik, and S.-H. Kim. Protein folding class predictor for scop: approach based on global descriptors. ismb, 5:104–107, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Muggleton, editor. Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. G. Hutchinson and J. M. Thornton. PROMOTIF-a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Science, 5(2):212–20, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. E. Brenner, C. Chothia, T. J. Hubbard, and A. G. Murzin. Understanding protein structure: using SLOP for fold interpretation. Methods in Enzymology, 266:635–43, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. J. Rawlings, W. R. Taylor, J. Fox J. Nyakairu, and M. J. E. Sternberg. Using Prolog to represent and reason about protein structure. In Ehud Y. Shapiro, editor, Third International Conference on Logic Programming, volume 225 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 536–543. Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. J. Barton and C. J. Rawlings. A Prolog approach to analysing protein structure. Tetrahedron Computer Methodology, 3(6C):739–756, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.A. Orengo, A.D. Michie, S. Jones, D.T. Jones, M.B. Swindells, and J.M. Thornton. OATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5(8):1093–1108, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. H. Gonnet and S. A. Benner. Computational biochemistry research at ETH. Technical report, E.T.H. Department Informatik, March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.J. Mooney and M.E. Califf. Induction of first-order decision lists: Results on learning the past tense of english verbs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:1–24, 1995. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0008D21 00003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Page

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turcotte, M., Muggleton, S.H., Sternberg, M.J.E. (1998). Application of inductive logic programming to discover rules governing the three-dimensional topology of protein structure. In: Page, D. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1446. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027310

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027310

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64738-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69059-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics