Skip to main content

Range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: Experimental verification of the analytical simulator

  • Basic Tools and Applications in Hip and Pelvis Surgery
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CVRMed-MRCAS'97 (CVRMed 1997, MRCAS 1997)

Abstract

Dislocation following total hip replacement surgery represents a significant cause of early failure, incurring additional medical costs. The causes of dislocation are multifactorial and are related to surgical approach, soft tissue tension, prosthetic design, and most important, orientation of components. This paper describes experimental verification of our analytical approach for predicting implant impingement and dislocation. Once fully developed and tested, this analytical methodology could be used as a preoperative simulation tool that will present surgeons with information about the “safe” range of motion and chance of dislocation based on selected component positions, allowing for the surgical plan to be optimized based on this criterion. Coupled with a computer-assisted clinical system for precise implant positioning, this approach could significantly reduce the postoperative risk of dislocation, maximize “safe” range of motion and minimize impingement.

This work was supported in part by a National Challenge grant from the National Science Foundation (award IRI-9422734) and by the Shadyside Hospital Competitive Research Fund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amstutz H.C., et al.: Range of Motion Studies for Total Hip Replacements. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (111), September 1975, 124–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amstutz, H.C. and Markolf, K.L.: Design features in total hip replacement. In Harris W.H. (ed.): Proceeding s of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society, New York, C.V.Mosby, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cobb T.K., Morrey B.F., Ilstrup D.M.: The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: Relationship to postoperative dislocation. JBJS, Vol 78-A, N0. 1, January 1996, 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DiGioia A.M., et al.: HipNav: Preoperative planning and intraoperative navigational guidance for acetabular implant placement in total hip replacement surgery. 2nd CAOS, Univ. of Bern, Switzerland, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerhardt J.J. and Ripstein J.: Measuring and Recording of Joint Motion, Instrumentation and Techniques. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Toronto, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greene W.B. and Hecknman J.D.: The clinical measurement of joint motion. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois, 97–114, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaramaz B., et al.: Simulation of implant impingement and dislocation in total hip replacement. CAR '96, 10th international symposium and exhibition, Paris, June 26–29, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston, R.C. and Smidt, G.L.: Hip motion measurement for selected activities of daily living. Clin. Orthop. Sept–Oct 1970; (72): 205–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krushell, R.J., Burke D.W., and Harris W.H.: Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty (the impact of modular head-neck components). The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 6 (2 1991): 97–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krushell, R.J., Burke D.W., and Harris W.H.: Elevated-rim acetabular components: Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 6, Suppl. October 1991: 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewinnek G.E., et al.: Dislocation after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. JBJS: 217–220, Vol. 60-A, No.2, March 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maxian T.A., et al.: Femoral head containment in total hip arthroplasty: Standard vs. extended lip liners. 42nd Annual meeting, Orthopaedic Research society, February 19–22, 1966, Atlanta, Georgia, 421.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maxian T.A., et al.: Finite element modeling of dislocation propensity in total hip arthroplasty. 42nd Annual meeting, Orthopaedic Research society, February 19–22, 1966, Atlanta, Georgia, 259–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCollum, D.E. and W.J. Gray. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (causes and prevention). Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 261 (1990): 159–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jocelyne Troccaz Eric Grimson Ralph Mösges

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaramaz, B., Nikou, C., Simon, D.A., DiGioia, A.M. (1997). Range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: Experimental verification of the analytical simulator. In: Troccaz, J., Grimson, E., Mösges, R. (eds) CVRMed-MRCAS'97. CVRMed MRCAS 1997 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029282

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029282

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68499-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics