Skip to main content

Investigating multiploidy's niche

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Computing (AISB EC 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1143))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A multiploid genotype comprises a number of chromosomes, and a ‘dominance’ mechanism underlying its interpretation. The simplest dominance mechanism uses a ‘mask’ chromosome, genes in which determine which gene from which chromosome is expressed at each locus. Previous work using contrived test problems showed that a multiploid was sometimes better than a normal genetic algorithm (GA), and sometimes not. Multiploidy seemed particularly helpful in cases where a normal GA would be likely to irretrievably lose important genetic material. Here we continute this investigation in the context of more realistic problems: the multiple knapsack problem, and the set covering problem. There are many complex effects, but experiments tend overall to reinforce the above suggestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.D. Bagley. The Behaviour of Adaptive Systems Which Employ Genetic and Correlation Algorithms. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.E. Beasley. OR-libraxy: Distributing test problems by electronic mail. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41:1069–1072, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emma Collingwood, David Corne, and Peter Ross. Useful diversity via multiploidy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation 1996, 1996. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dipankar Dasgupta and Douglas R. McGregor. Using structured genetic algorithms for solving deceptive problems. Technical report, University of Strathclyde Department of Computer Science, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. Goldberg. Simple genetic algorithms and the minimal deceptive problem. In L. Davis, editor, Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing, Research Notes in AI, chapter 6, pages 74–88. Pitman, London, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luis F. González-Hernández and David W. Corne. Evolutionary divide and conquer for the set covering problem. In T. Fogarty, editor, Evolutionary Computing: Proceedings of the AISB Workshop, Brighton, 1996. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Darrell Whitley. The GENITOR algorithm and selection pressure. In J. D. Schaffer, editor, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 161–121. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yukiko Yoshida and Nobue Adachi. A diploid genetic algorithm for preserving population diversity — pseudo-meiosis ga. In Manner Davidor, Schwefel, editor, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature: PPSN III, pages 36–45. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Terence C. Fogarty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corne, D., Collingwood, E., Ross, P. (1996). Investigating multiploidy's niche. In: Fogarty, T.C. (eds) Evolutionary Computing. AISB EC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032783

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032783

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61749-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70671-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics