Skip to main content

Automatic documentation generation: Including examples

  • Invited Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (SBIA 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 991))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Good documentation is critical for user acceptance of any system, and empirical studies have shown that examples can greatly increase effectiveness of system documentation. However, studies also show that badly integrated text and examples can be actually detrimental compared to using either text or examples alone. It is thus clear that in order to provide useful documentation automatically, a system must be capable of providing well-integrated examples to illustrate its points.

Previous work on example generation has concentrated on the issue of retrieving or constructing examples. In our work, we looked at the integration of text and examples. We identified how text and examples co-constrain each other and showed that a system must consider example generation as an integral part of the generation process. We implemented a system capable of producing documentation that integrated text and examples.

This work was carried out with Vibhu Mittal, when both Dr. Mittal and the author were at the University of Southern California/Information Sciences Institute. The author gratefully acknowledges support from NASA-Ames grant NCC 2-520 and DARPA contract DABT63-91-C-0025.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paul Chandler and John Sweller. Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4):292–332, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davida H. Charney, Lynne M. Reder, and Gail W. Wells. Studies of Elaboration in Instructional Texts. In Stephen Doheny-Farina, editor, Effective Documentation: What we have learned from Research, chapter 3, pages 48–72. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. C. Clark. Teaching Concepts in the Classroom: A Set of Prescriptions derived from Experimental Research. Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph, 62:253–278,1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steven K. Feiner and Kathleen R. McKeown. Automating the generation of coordinated multi-media explanations. Computer, 24(10):33–42, October 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Katherine Voerwerk Feldman. The effects of the number of positive and negative instances, concept definitions, and emphasis of relevant attributes on the attainment of mathematical concepts. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John C. Houtz, J. William Moore, and J. Kent Davis. Effects of Different Types of Positive and Negative Examples in Learning “non-dimensioned” Concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2):206–211,1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert MacGregor. A Deductive Pattern Matcher. In Proceedings of the 1988 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, St Paul, Mn, August 1988. American Association of Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William Mann and Sandra Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Text 8(2):243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kathleen R. McKeown. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwina Rissland Michener. Understanding Understanding Mathematics. Cognitive Science Journal, 2(4):361–383,1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vibhu O. Mittal. Generating Natural Language Descriptions with Integrated Text and Examples. PhD thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vibhu O. Mittal and Cécile L. Paris. Categorizing Example Types in Instructional Texts: The Need to consider Context. In Proceedings of AI-ED 93: World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1993. AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vibhu O. Mittel and Cécile L. Paris. Generating Natural Language Descriptions with Examles: Differences between introductory and advanced texts. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence — AAAI 93, pages 271–276. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vibhu O. Mittal and Cécile L. Paris. Generating Examples For Use in Tutorial Explanations: The Use of a Subsumption Based Classifier. In Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-94), pages 530–534, Amsterdam, August 1994. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johanna D. Moore and Cécile L. Paris. Planning text for advisory dialogues. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 203–211, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johanna D. Moore and Cécile L. Paris. Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional, and Rhetorical Information. Computational Linguistics, 19(4):651–694, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johanna Doris Moore. A Reactive Approach to Explanation in Expert and Advice-Giving Systems. PhD thesis, University of California-Los Angeles, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynne M. Reder, Davida H. Charney, and Kim I. Morgan. The Role of Elaborations in learning a skill from an Instructional Text. Memory and Cognition, 14(1):64–78, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brian J. Reiser, John R. Anderson, and Robert G. Farrell. Dynamic Student Modelling in an Intelligent Tutor for Lisp Programming. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 8–14. IJCAI-85 (Los Angeles), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Edwina L. Rissland. Example Generation. In Proceedings of the Third National Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, pages 280–288. CIPS, Toronto, Ontario, May 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edwina L. Rissland and Kevin D. Ashley. Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 289–297. AAAI, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, and Kevin D. Ashley. Explaining and Arguing with Examples. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 288–294. AAAI, August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daniel D. Suthers and Edwina L. Rissland. Constraint Manipulation for Example Generation. COINS Technical Report 88-71, Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. William R. Swartout, Cecile L. Paris, and Johanna D. Moore. Design for explainable expert systems. IEEE Expert, 6(3):58–64,1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. David S. Touretzky. LISP: A Gentle Introduction to Symbolic Computation. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paul Werth. Focus, Coherence and Emphasis. Croom Helm, London, England, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beverly Woolf and David D. McDonald. Context-Dependent Transitions in Tutoring Discourse. In Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 355–361. AAAI, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jacques Wainer Ariadne Carvalho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paris, C.L. (1995). Automatic documentation generation: Including examples. In: Wainer, J., Carvalho, A. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. SBIA 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 991. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034794

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034794

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60436-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47467-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics