Skip to main content

Mapping expert behavior onto task-level frameworks: The need for “Eco-pragmatic” approaches to knowledge engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Contemporary Knowledge Engineering and Cognition

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 622))

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to explore the possibilities of exploiting psychological methods for the purpose of knowledge engineering. Hypotheses are presented why both the pure “psychological” and the pure “engineering” positions are not viable for building expert systems. A “middle-out” strategy is proposed that preserves the best of both worlds while minimizing the problems of each. This “middle-out” strategy consists of the application of so-called “task-level frameworks”. However, these frameworks do not sufficiently support one of the most crucial tasks in the knowledge engineering process, namely the mapping of the actual expert behavior onto conceptual models. In this paper, a new method which makes this process easier and more reliable is described and a standardized several-step procedure for mapping expertise-in-action protocols onto a task-level framework is illustrated with a case study. It is concluded (a) that protocol analysis is a good starting point for developing tools to support the knowledge engineering process—if appropriate methods are available, and (b) that methods are only appropriate if they are ecological on the one hand and pragmatic on the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, R.P. (1981). Whatever became of consistency theory. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, C., Brunet, E., & Anjewierden, A. (1989). Shelley: An integrated workbench for KBS development. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Expert Systems and Their Applications, Avignon, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuker, J.A., & Wielinga, B.J. (1989). Models of expertise in knowledge acquisition. In G. Guida & C. Tasso (Eds.). Topics in expert system design, 265–295. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B. (1986). Generic tasks in knowledge based reasoning: High level building blocks for expert system design. IEEE Expert, Fall, 1986, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. (1985). Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence, 27, 298–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. (1984). Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. Artificial Intelligence, 24 347–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J. (1984). How circuits work. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 205–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1971). Intentional systems. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 87–106. (reprinted in J. Haugeland (Ed.) (1981). Mind design (pp.220–242). Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaper, D. (Ed.) (1989). Knowledge elicitation. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1976). Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung (Problem solving as information processing). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C.L. & Mittal, S. (1985). Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts. AI Magazine, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, A.S., Shulman, L.S., & Sprafka, S.A. (1978). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. (1990). Symbolic connectionism: toward third-generation theories of expertise. Techreport UCLA-CSRO-90-14. (to appear in I.A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.). Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (1990). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (2., durchges. Auflage). (Qualitative content analysis: Foundations and techniques). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. (1988). Preliminary steps toward a taxonomy of problem-solving methods. In S. Marcus (Ed.). Automating knowledge acquisition for expert systems (pp. 225–256). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1982). Memory observed. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental data. Psychological Review, 84. 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V.F., & Groen, G.J. (1986). Knowledge-based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10, 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadbolt, N., & Burton, A.M. (1989). The empirical study of knowledge elicitation techniques. SIGART Newsletter, 108, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M.L.G., & Gaines, B. (1989). Knowledge acquisition: Some foundations, manual methods, and future trends. Proceedings of EKAW-89, Paris, France. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sol, H.G., Takkenberg, C.A., & DeVries Robbé, P.F. (Eds.) (1987). Expert systems and artificial intelligence in decision support systems. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (1990). Components of expertise. AI Magazine, 11(2), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanwelkenhuysen, J. (1989). TroTelc: An expert system troubleshooting printed ciruit boards. VUB AI Memo 89-17. Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanwelkenhuysen, J., & Rademakers, P. (1990). Mapping a knowledge level analysis onto a computational framework. Proceedings ECAI (pp. 661–666). Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C. (1990). KOD: A method for knowledge acquisition and modeling. Tutorial at the Tenth International Workshop on Expert Systems and Their Applications. Avignon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, M.R., & Weinert, F.E. (1990). Intelligenz und Denken (Intelligence and thinking). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Franz Schmalhofer Gerhard Strube Thomas Wetter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pfeifer, R., Rothenfluh, T., Stolze, M., Steiner, F. (1992). Mapping expert behavior onto task-level frameworks: The need for “Eco-pragmatic” approaches to knowledge engineering. In: Schmalhofer, F., Strube, G., Wetter, T. (eds) Contemporary Knowledge Engineering and Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 622. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045681

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045681

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55711-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47277-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics