Skip to main content

Industrial experiences from SCM current state analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
System Configuration Management (SCM 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1439))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes a systematic approach for collecting and analysing software configuration management (SCM) requirements. The analysis is based on Pr2imer, Practical Process Improvement for Embedded Real-Time Software, which is a framework for process improvement. Pr2imer applies interviews for qualitative analysis and assessment, such as BOOTSTRAP, for quantitative analysis. It also includes a Goal/Question/Metrics (GQM)-based approach for identifying goals for new practices. An industrial experiment employing SCM requirements analysis has been carried out in the VISCOUNT1 project. The results of requirements analysis, and the advantages of the approach are presented, including a plan for future, work where virtual software corporations will be supported by advanced SCM systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auer, A., Taramaa, J. Experience Report on the Maturity of Configuration Management for Embedded Software, In: I. Sommerville (ed.), The 6th International Workshop on Software Configuration Management (SCM6), Berlin, Germany, March 1996, Published by Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1167, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G. and Rombach, H. D. The goal question metric approach, in Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boldyreff, C., Newman, J., Taramaa, J. Managing Process Improvement in Virtual Software Corporations, In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Applications (WET ICE '96), Stanford, California, June 1996, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dart, S.A. Concepts in Configuration Management Systems, In: Feiler, P.H. (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Configuration Management (SCM3), Trondheim, Norway, June 1991, ACM Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dart, S.A., Adopting an Automated Configuration Management Solution, the Eight International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE'95), Toronto, Ontario, July 1995, an invited speech, 15 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidow, W.H. and Malone, M.S. The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century. Harper Business, New York, 1992, 294 p

    Google Scholar 

  7. Humphrey, W.S. Characterizing the Software Process: A Maturity Framework, IEEE Software, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1988, pp. 73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC 12207. Informational Technology — Software Life Cycle Processes, International Standard, ISO/IEC Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995, 57 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC 15504. SPICE — Software Process Assessment — Part 5: Construction, Selection and Use of Assessment Instruments and Tools, Version 1.00, ISO/IEC Copyright Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995, 130 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karjalainen, J., Mäkäräinen, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. and Seppänen, V., Practical process improvement for embedded real-time software. Quality Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1996, pp. 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuvaja, P., Similä, J., Kraznik, L., Bicego A., Saukkonen S. and Koch, G. BOOTSTRAP: Europe's Assessment Method, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1994, 149 p

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tichy, W. Tools for Software Configuration Management, International Workshop on Software Version and Configuration Control, Grassau, Germany, January 1988, In: Winkler J.F.H. (ed.), the German Chapter of the ACM, Vol. 30, Teubner Verlag, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. VISCOUNT, EU/Esprit project 25754 Project Plan Version 4.1-21 July, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Välimäki, A., Confmanag — Enhancing software configuration management for the process control system, MID-TERM report, EU/ESSI project 23891 — 28.11.1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wein M., MacKay S.A., Stewart D.A., Gauthier C.-A., Gentleman W.M. Evolution is essential for software tool development, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 10–14, 1995, pp. 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Boris Magnusson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rahikkala, T., Taramaa, J., Välimäki, A. (1998). Industrial experiences from SCM current state analysis. In: Magnusson, B. (eds) System Configuration Management. SCM 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053874

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053874

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64733-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69086-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics