Skip to main content

Genetic algorithm behavior in the MAXSAT domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V (PPSN 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Random Boolean Satisfiability function generators have recently been proposed as tools for studying genetic algorithm behavior. Yet MAXSAT problems exhibit extremely limited epistasis. Furthermore, all nonzero Walsh coefficients can be computed exactly for MAXSAT problems in polynomial time using only the clause information. This means the low order schema averages can be computed quickly and exactly for very large MAXSAT problems. But unless P=NP, this low order information cannot reliably lead to the global optimum, thus nontrivial MAXSAT problems must be deceptive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Cheeseman, B. Kanefsky, and W. M. Taylor. Where the really hard problems are. In Proc. Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Davis and H Putnam. A computing procedure for quantification theory. Journal of the ACM, 7:201–215, 1960.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Frank. A Study of Genetic Algorithms to Find Approximate Solutions to Hard 3CNF Problems. Golden West International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Frank, P. Cheeseman, and J. Stutz. When gravity fails: Local search topology. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7:249–281, 1997.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Goldberg. Genetic algorithms and walsh functions: Part I, a gentle introduction. Complex Systems, 3:129–152, 1989.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Goldberg. Genetic algorithms and walsh functions: Part II, deception and its analysis. Complex Systems, 3:153–171, 1989.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Mitchell, B. Selman, and H. Levesque. Hard and easy distribution of sat problems. In Proc. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Rana, R. Heckendorn, and D. Whitley. A tractable walsh analysis of Sat and its implications for genetic algorithms. In Proc. Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Reeves and C. Wright. Epistasis in genetic algorithms: An experimental design perspective. In Larry Eshelman, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 217–224. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Selman, H. Levesque, and D. Mitchell. A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems. In Proc. Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 440–446, San Jose, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Agoston E. Eiben Thomas Bäck Marc Schoenauer Hans-Paul Schwefel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rana, S., Whitley, D. (1998). Genetic algorithm behavior in the MAXSAT domain. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, HP. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V. PPSN 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056920

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056920

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49672-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics