Skip to main content

Planning via model checking in determistic domains: Preliminary report

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 1998)

Abstract

In this paper we report on SMV and NuSmv performances on a set of “model checking problems” variously generated starting from deterministic domain descriptions. The comparison with other state-of-the-art planning systems reveals that “planning via model checking” is a promising research line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Allen, J. Hendler, and A. Tate (Eds.). Reading in planning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anthony Barrett and Daniel S. Weld. Partial order planning: Evaluating possible efficiency gains. Artificial Intelligence, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avrim Blum and Merrick Furst. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, pages 1636–1642, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Cimatti, E. Clarke, F. Giunchiglia, and M. Roveri. Nusmv: a reimplementation of Smv. In International Workshop on Software and Tools for Technology Transfer BRICS, Aalborg, Denmark, July 12–13, 1998. Technical Report 9801-06, IRST, Trento, Italy, January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Cimatti, E. Giunchiglia, F. Giunchiglia, and P. Traverso. Planning via Model Checking: A Decision Procedure for AR. In S. Steel and R. Alami, editors, Proceeding of the Fourth European Conference on Planning, number 1348 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 130–142, Toulouse, France, September 1997. Springer-Verlag. Also ITC-IRST Technical Report 9705-02, ITC-IRST Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Cimatti, M. Roveri, and P. Traverso. Automatic OBDD-based Generation of Universal Plans in Non-Deterministic Domains. In Proceeding of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), July 26–30, 1998, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cimatti, M. Roveri, and P. Traverso. Strong Planning in Non-Deterministic Domains via Model Checking. In Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-98), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 1998. AAAI-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.M. Clarke and E. A. Emerson. Synthesis of synchronization skeletons for branching time temporal logic. In Logic of Programs: Workshop. Springer Verlag, May 1981. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James Crawford and Larry Auton. Experimental results on the crossover point in satisfiability problems. Artificial Intelligence, 81(1–2):31–58, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Michael Ernst, Todd Millstein, and Daniel Weld. Automatic SAT-compilation of planning problems. In Proc. IJCAI-97, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. E. Fikes and N. J. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2(3–4):189–208, 1971.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz. Representing actions in extended logic programming. In Krzysztof Apt, editor, Proc. Joint Int'l Conf. and Symp. on Logic Programming, pages 559–573, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enrico Giunchiglia. Determining Ramifications in the Situation Calculus. In In Fifth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'96), Cambridge, Massachusetts, November, 5–8 1996. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enrico Giunchiglia, G. Neelakantan Kartha, and Vladimir Lifschitz. Representing action: indeterminacy and ramifications. Artificial Intelligence, 95:409–443, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Cordell Green. Application of theorem proving to problem solving. In Proc. IJCAI, pages 219–240, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steve Hanks and Drew McDermott. Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection. Artificial Intelligence, 33(3):379–412, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Henry Kautz and Bart Selman. Planning as satisfiability. In Proc. ECAI-92, pages 359–363, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henry Kautz and Bart Selman. Pushing the envelope: planning, propositional logic and stochastic search. In Proc. AAAI-96, pages 1194–1201, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vladimir Lifschitz. Two components of an action language. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 21:305–320, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. John McCarthy. Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. John McCarthy and Patrick Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the stand-point of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence, volume 4, pages 463–502. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1969. Reproduced in [20].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kenneth McMillan. Symbolic Model Checking. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Fausto Giunchiglia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Manzo, M., Giunchiglia, E., Ruffino, S. (1998). Planning via model checking in determistic domains: Preliminary report. In: Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1480. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057447

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0057447

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64993-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49793-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics