Skip to main content

Reasoning without minimality

  • Reasoning (Non-monotonic Reasoning, Default Logic, Commonsense Reasoning)
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1531))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Various forms of non-monotonic reasoning thrive on minimal change in some form or other. In general, the principle of minimal change prescribes choosing the best from a given set of alternatives. A dual of this principle, which has not drawn much attention from the researchers in the field, is to reject the worst from a given set of alternatives instead. This paper explores the use of this principle in the context of belief revision, which has known connections with plausible reasoning. Apart from arguing that the suggested operation is not excessively weak, we provide a set of “revision postulates” that demonstrably characterises this “non minimal” belief revision operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50:510–530, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Robert M. Axelrod. Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Gärdenfors. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson. Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence, 65:197–245, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Adam Grove. Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17:157–170, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. John H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial intelligence, 44:167–207, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirofumi Katsuno and Alberto O. Mendelzon. On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In Peter Gärdenfors, editor, Belief Revision, pages 183–203. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maurice Pagnucco. The Role of Abductive Reasoning within the Process of Belief revision. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hans Rott. Making up one’s mind: Foundations, coherence, nonmonotonicity. To be published by Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erik Sandewall. Features and Fluents. Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoav Shoham. Reasoning About Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hing-Yan Lee Hiroshi Motoda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nayak, A., Foo, N. (1998). Reasoning without minimality. In: Lee, HY., Motoda, H. (eds) PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095263

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095263

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65271-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49461-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics