Skip to main content

Context-specific independence, decomposition of conditional probabilities, and inference in Bayesian networks

  • Bayesian Network
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1531))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Three kinds of independence are of interest in the context og Bayesian networks, namely conditional independence, independence of causal influence, and context-specific independence. It is well-known that conditional independence anables one to factorize a joint probability into a list of conditional probabilities and thereby renders inference feasible. It has recently been shown that independence of causal influence leads to further factorizations of some of the conditional probabilities and consequently makes inference faster. This paper studies context-specific independence. We show that context-specific independence can be used to further decompose some of the conditional probabilities. We present an inference algorithm that takes advantage of the decompositions and provide, for the first time, empirical evidence that demonstrates the computational benefits of exploiting context-specific independence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Boutilier, N. Friedman, M. Goldszmidt, and D. Koller (1996), Context-specific independence in Bayesian networks, Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. M. Fung and R. D. Shachter (1990), Contingent Influence Diagrams, Advanced Decision Systems, 1500 Plymouth St., Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Geiger and D. Heckerman (1996), Knowledge representation and inference in similarity networks and Bayesian multimets, Artificial Intelligence, 92, pp. 45–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Heckerman (1993), Causal independence for knowledge acquisition and inference, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Howard and J. E. Matheson (1984), Influence Diagrams, The principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, Vol. II, R. A. Howard and J. E. Matheson (eds.). Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. V. Jensen, U. Kjærulff, K. G. Olesen, and J. Pedersen (1989), Et forprojekt til et ekspertsystem for drift af spildevandsrensning (An expert system for control of waste water treatment—A pilot project), Technical Report, Judex Datasystemer A/S, Aalborg, Denmark (in Danish).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. G. Olesen and S. Andreassen (1993), Specification of models in large expert systems based on causal probabilitis networks, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 5, pp. 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. M. Olmsted (1983), Representing and solving decision problems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pearl (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligence Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Poole (1997), Probabilistic partial evaluation: exploiting rule structure in probabilistic inference, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1284–1291.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. R. Quinlan (1986), Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning, 1, pp. 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Santos Jr. and S. E. Shimony (1996), Exploiting case-based independence for approximating marginal probabilities, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 14, pp. 25–54.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Shafer (1996), Probabilistic Expert Systems, SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. E. Smith, S. Holtzman and J. E. Matheson (1993), Structuring conditional relationships in influence diagrams. Operations Research, 41, No. 2, pp. 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. L. Zhang and D. Poole (1996), Exploiting causal independence in Bayesian network inference, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 5, pp. 301–328.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. N. L. Zhang (1998), Inference in Bayesian networks: The role of contextspecific independence, Technical Report, HKUST-CS98-09, Department of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. Available at http://www.cs.ust.hk/lhang/paper/csitr.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hing-Yan Lee Hiroshi Motoda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, N.L. (1998). Context-specific independence, decomposition of conditional probabilities, and inference in Bayesian networks. In: Lee, HY., Motoda, H. (eds) PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095288

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095288

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65271-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49461-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics