Skip to main content

Design, delay and performance in gaze control: Engineering and biological approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The confluence of vision and control

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 237))

  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper published control models for robotic and biological gaze control systems are reviewed with an emphasis on dynamics characteristics and performance. The earlier work of Brown[2] is extended, taking into account more recent neurophysiological models and high-performance visual servoing results. All the models are compared using common notation and diagrammatic framework which clearly show the essential commonalities and differences between approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. J. Åström and B. Wittenmark. Computer Controlled Systems: Theory and Design. Prentice Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Brown. Gaze controls with interactions and delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 20(1):518–527, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Collewijn. Integration of adaptive changes of the optokinetic reflex, pursuit and vestibulo-ocular reflex. In A. Berthoz and G. M. Jones, editors, Adaptive mechanisms in gaze control: facts and theories, Reviews of oculomotor research, chapter 3, pages 51–69. Elsevier, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Corke. Dynamic issues in robot visual-servo systems. In G. Giralt and G. Hirzinger, editors, Robotics Research. The Seventh International Symposium, pages 488–498. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. I. Corke. Visual Control of Robots: High-Performance visual servoing. Mechatronics. Research Studies Press (John Wiley), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Goldreich, R. Krauzlis, and S. Lisberger. Efect of changing feedback delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys. J. Neurophysiology, 67(3):625–638, Mar. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Hutchinson, G. Hager, and P. Corke. A tutorial on visual servo control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(5):651–670, Oct. 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Krauzlis and S. Lisberger. A model of visually-guided smooth pursuit eye movements based on behavioural observations. J. Computational Neuroscience, 1:265–283, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Ringach. A ‘tachometer’ feedback model of smooth pursuit eye movements. Biological Cybernetics, 73:561–568, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Robinson, J. Gordon, and S. Gordon. A model of smooth pursuit eye movement system. Biological Cybernetics, 55:43–57, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Robinson. Why visuomotor systems don't like negative feedback and how they avoid it. In M. A. Arbib and A. R. Hanson, editors, Vision, Brain, and Cooperative Computation. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Sharkey and D. Murray. Delays versus performance of visually guided systems. IEEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl., 143(5):436–447, Sept. 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wavering, J. Fiala, K. Roberts, and R. Lumia. Triclops: A high-performance trinocular active vision system. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pages 410–417, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Young. Pursuit eye tracking movements. In P. Bach-Y-Rita and C. Collins, editors, The control of eye movements, pages 429–443. Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David J. Kriegman PhD Gregory D. Hager PhD A. Stephen Morse PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corke, P. (1998). Design, delay and performance in gaze control: Engineering and biological approaches. In: Kriegman, D.J., Hager, G.D., Morse, A.S. (eds) The confluence of vision and control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 237. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0109669

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0109669

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-025-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-528-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics