Skip to main content

Providing future telecommunication services to naive users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bringing Telecommunication Services to the People — IS&N '95 (IS&N 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 998))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

The RACE II LUSI (Likeable and Usable Service Interfaces) project has investigated the use of existing and future telecommunications services by the general public. The project has an underlying premise that the requirements of business users in the telecommunications marketplace have been extensively dealt with, however, the particular needs of members of the general public are often overlooked.

The paper will present case studies of two such RACE experiments and compare these evaluations with the experiences of the LUSI project evaluations. The case studies are;

The provision of an expert system and PC integrated videoconferencing facilities for rural farming in Bari in the South of Italy. Making use of CD ROM, the World Wide Web, and the TELES.VISION videoconferencing system. The study was conducted as part of the RACE AREA project.

The installation of a public access multimedia shopping and information kiosk in Basel, Switzerland. This study was conducted as part of the RACE ESSAI project

Recently a great deal has been written about the role of human factors and usability issues in the future of telecommunications, and some commentators have even gone so far as to suggest that usability is not a primary factor in determining the success of a new system. However the reported studies lend strong support to the case for usability in services.

The overriding factor affecting the uptake of new services studied by the LUSI project is that most of the target customers are not aware that they need the service, in fact, some may even be resistant to the service. This is to some extent due to the fact that they are not technology literate, and in some circumstances they are technophobic.

The most startling empirical finding from the evaluations was that the first impressions of the ease of use of a new service is absolutely crucial in the acceptability of that service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, C.M. “Human Computer Interface Design Guidelines” Norwood, NJ: Ablex 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frude, N. “Information Technology in the Home: Promises as yet unrealised” in ‘Information Technology and People’ ed Blackler, F and Oborne, D. British Psychological Society, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hewson, T.J., Allison, G., Clarke, A.M., “Evaluation of Telecommunications Services and Terminals: A Heuristic Questionnaire Protocol versus Empirical User Testing,” Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hewson, T.J. and Clarke, A.M., “Overview of the RACE II LUSI Project”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Spaniol, O. and Williams, F. (eds), North-Holland, Broadband Islands: Towards Integration, Athens, Greece, 14–16 June, 1993, pp 267–270, ISBN 0 444 81710 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laurel, B. “The art of Human Computer Interface Design” Addison Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. LUSI Project Deliverable No. 11 “ Report on Results of the User Trials Across the User Group Panels.” CEC Del. No. R2092/HUS/-/DS/P/011/b1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maguire, M.C., “A Study of the Problems of Man-Computer Dialogues for Naive Users” PhD Thesis, Leicester Polytechnic, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. May, A.J. “Development of Generic User Requirements for Interactive Public Information Systems,” MSc Ergonomics Thesis, University of London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen, J., “Hypertext and Hypermedia” Academic Press Inc, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. “Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces” In proceedings of CIII '90 ed. Chew, J.C., and Whiteside, J., Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rubin, J. “Handbook of Usability Testing” Wiley and Sons. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin, T. “User Interface Design for Computer Systems”, Chichester, England, Ellis Horwood, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz, B., Salasoo, A., Egan D., McConkie, A. “Usability Vs Accessibility: “Easy to Gel” is more important than “Easy to Use”, Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shneiderman, B. “Designing the User Interface” Addison-Wesley. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, S. & Mosier, J. “Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software” Technical report ESDE-TR-86-278, 1986, Hanscom AFB, MA: USAF Electronic Systems Division.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anne Clarke Mario Campolargo Nikos Karatzas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hewson, T.J., Allison, G., Clarke, A.M. (1995). Providing future telecommunication services to naive users. In: Clarke, A., Campolargo, M., Karatzas, N. (eds) Bringing Telecommunication Services to the People — IS&N '95. IS&N 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 998. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016959

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0016959

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60479-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47618-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics