Skip to main content

Towards a formal theory of intentions

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in AI (JELIA 1990)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 478))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Intentions are an important concept in several subfields of Artificial Intelligence. We present a formal theory of intentions and beliefs based on Discourse Representation Theory that captures many of the important logical aspects of the functional roles of intentions and beliefs, and of relationships among intentions, and between intentions and beliefs. Unlike possible worlds approaches, this theory does not assume that agents are perfect reasoners, and gives a realistic view of their internal architecture; unlike most representational approaches, it has an objective semantics, and does not rely on an ad hoc labeling of the internal states of agents. We then describe a minimal logic for intentions and beliefs. We close with several additional inferences, and the constraints on the model that correspond to them.

We are indebted to Allen Emerson and Rob Koons for several discussions and for comments on previous versions of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Philip Agre and David Chapman. Pengi: an implementation of a theory of activity. In AAAI-87, pages 268–272, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Allen and C. Raymond Perrault. Participating in dialogues: understanding via plan deduction. In Proceedings, CSCSI-78, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James F. Allen and C. Raymond Perrault. Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15:143–178, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Douglas Appelt. Planning English Sentences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholas Asher. Belief in discourse representation theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15:127–189, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholas Asher. Information, interpretation, and attitudes. In P. Hanson, editor, British Columbia Studies in Cognitive Science, 1990. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholas Asher. A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10:125–197, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael E. Bratman. Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brian F. Chellas. Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Philip R. Cohen and Hector J. Levesque. Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. Technical Report 433, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, April 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Philip R. Cohen and C. Raymond Perrault. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3:117–212, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel C. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. A. Emerson. Temporal and modal logic. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronald Fagin and Joseph Y. Halpern. Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 34:39–76, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern, and Moshe Y. Vardi. A nonstandard approach to the logical omniscience problem. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael P. Georgeff. Planning. In J. F. Traub, editor, Annual Review of Computer Science, Vol 2, Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, CA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barbara Grosz and Candace Sidner. Attentions, intentions, and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175–204, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Kamp. Context, thought and communication. The Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, LXXXV(XIII):239–261, 1984/1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hans Kamp. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Jansenn, and M. Stokhof, editors, Truth, Interpretation and Information, pages 1–41, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kurt Konolige. A Deduction Model of Belief. Morgan Kaufmann, Inc, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saul Kripke. A puzzle about belief. In A. Margalit, editor, Meaning and Use, Dordrecht Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hector Levesque. A logic of implicit and explicit belief. In AAAI-84, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Diane J. Litman and James F. Allen. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversations. Cognitive Science, 11:163–200, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Drew V. McDermott. A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans. Cognitive Science, 6(2):101–155, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barbara Hall Partee. Belief-sentences and the limits of semantics. In Stanley Peters and Esa Saarinen, editors, Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raymond Perrault. An Application of Default Logic to Speech Act Theory. Technical Report 90, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, March 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martha E. Pollack. Inferring Domain Plans in Question Answering. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stanley J. Rosenschein. Formal theories of knowledge in AI and robotics. New Generation Computing, 3(4), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. John R. Searle. Intentionality: An essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Munindar P. Singh. Group ability and structure. In 2nd European Workshop on the Modeling of Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Munindar P. Singh. Group intentions. In 10th Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, October 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Munindar P. Singh. Towards a theory of situated know-how. In 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Robert C. Stalnaker. Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

J. van Eijck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Singh, M.P., Asher, N.M. (1991). Towards a formal theory of intentions. In: van Eijck, J. (eds) Logics in AI. JELIA 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018460

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018460

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53686-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46982-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics