Skip to main content

MulTVision: A tool for visualizing parallel program executions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Symbolic Computing: Languages, Systems, and Applications (PSC 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 748))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

MulTVision is a visualization tool that supports both performance measurement and debugging by helping a programmer see what happens during a specific, traced execution of a program. MulTVision has two components: a debug monitor and a replay engine. A traced execution yields a log as a by-product; both the debug monitor and the replay engine use this log as input. The debug monitor produces a graphical display showing the relationships between tasks in the traced execution. Using this display, a programmer can see bottlenecks or other causes of poor performance. The replay engine can be used to reproduce internal program states that existed during the traced execution. The replay engine uses a novel log protocol—the side- effect touch protocol-oriented toward programs that are mostly functional (have few side effects). Measurements show that the tracing overhead added to mostly functional programs is generally less than the overhead already incurred for task management and touch operations. While currently limited to program executions that create at most tens of thousands of tasks, MulTVision is already useful for an interesting class of programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagnall, L., Par Vis: A Program Visualization Tool for Multilisp, S.M. thesis, MIT E.E.C.S. Dept., Cambridge, Mass., Feb. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, P., and J. Wileden, “High-Level Debugging of Distributed Systems: The Behavioral Abstraction Approach,” J. of System Software 3, 1983, pp. 255–244.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carver, R., and K.-C. Tai, “Reproducible Testing of Concurrent Programs Based on Shared Variables,” 6th Int'l. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1986, pp. 428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fowler, R., T. LeBlanc, and J. Mellor-Crummey, “An Integrated Approach to Parallel Program Debugging and Performance Analysis on Large-Scale Multiprocessors,” ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Debugging, SIGPLAN Notices 24:1, January 1989, pp. 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geist, G.A., et al., PICL: A Portable Instrumented Communication Library, C Reference Manual, Technical Report ORNL/TM-11130, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halstead, R., “Multilisp: A Language for Concurrent Symbolic Computation,” ACM Trans. on Prog. Languages and Systems 7:4, October 1985, pp. 501–538.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Halstead, R., and D. Kranz, “A Replay Mechanism for Mostly Functional Parallel Programs,” Technical Report CRL 90/6, DEC Cambridge Research Lab, Nov. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Halstead, R., and D. Kranz, “A Replay Mechanism for Mostly Functional Parallel Programs,” International Symposium on Shared-Memory Multiprocessing, Tokyo, April 1991. In N. Suzuki, ed., Shared Memory Multiprocessing, MIT Press, 1992, pp. 287–313.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harter, P., D. Heimbigner, and R. King, “Idd: An Interactive Distributed Debugger,” 5th Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1985, pp. 498–506.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heath, M., and J. Etheridge, “Visualizing the Performance of Parallel Programs,” IEEE Software 8:5, Sept. 1991, pp. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heath, M., and J. Etheridge, Visualizing Performance of Parallel Programs, Technical Report ORNL/TM-11813, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrarte, V., and E. Lusk, Studying Parallel Program Behavior with Upshot, Technical Report ANL-91/15, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hough, A., and J. Cuny, “Belvedere: Prototype of a Pattern-Oriented Debugger for Highly Parallel Computation,” 1987 Intl. Conf. on Parallel Processing, August 1987, pp. 735–738.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kranz, D., R. Halstead, and E. Mohr, “Mul-T, A High-Performance Parallel Lisp,” ACM SIGPLAN '89 Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Portland, OR, June 1989, pp. 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LeBlanc, R., and A. Robbins, “Event-Driven Monitoring of Distributed Programs,” 5th Int'l. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1985, pp. 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  16. LeBlanc, T., and J. Mellor-Crummey, “Debugging Parallel Programs with Instant Replay,” IEEE Trans. Computers C-36:4, April 1987, pp. 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malony, A., D. Hammerslag, and D. Jablonowski, “Traceview: A Trace Visualization Tool,” IEEE Software 8:5, Sept. 1991, pp. 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mellor-Crummey, J., Debugging and Analysis of Large-Scale Parallel Programs, Technical Report 312, University of Rochester Computer Science Dept., Sept. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, B., and J.-D. Choi, ACM SIGPLAN '88 Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Atlanta, June 1988, pp. 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reed, D., R. Olson, R. Aydt, T. Madhyastha, T. Birkett, D. Jensen, B. Nazief, and B. Totty, “Scalable Performance Environments for Parallel Systems,” Sixth Distributed Memory Computing Conference (IEEE), April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reed, D., R. Aydt, T. Madhyastha, R. Noe, K. Shields, and B. Schwartz, “The Pablo Performance Analysis Environment,” Technical Report, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rees, J., N. Adams, and J. Meehan, The T Manual, fifth edition, (pre-beta draft), Yale University Computer Science Department, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rees, J., and W. Clinger, eds., “Revised 3 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices 21:12, Dec. 1986, pp. 37–79.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin, R., L. Rudolph, and D. Zernik, “Debugging Parallel Programs in Parallel,” ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Debugging, SIGPLAN Notices 24:1, January 1989, pp. 216–225.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segall, Z., and L. Rudolph, “PIE: A Program and Instrumentation Environment for Parallel Processing,” IEEE Software 2:6, Nov. 1985, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka, H., and J. Tatemura, “HyperDEBU: A Multiwindow Debugger for Parallel Logic Programs,” Parallel Symbolic Computing: Languages, Systems, and Applications (U.S./Japan workshop, October 1992), Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert H. Halstead Jr. Takayasu Ito

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Halstead, R.H., Kranz, D.A., Sobalvarro, P.G. (1993). MulTVision: A tool for visualizing parallel program executions. In: Halstead, R.H., Ito, T. (eds) Parallel Symbolic Computing: Languages, Systems, and Applications. PSC 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 748. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018653

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018653

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57396-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48133-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics