Skip to main content

Cognition is not computation; Evolution is not optimisation

  • Part V: Robotics, Adaptive Autonomous Agents, and Control
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97 (ICANN 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1327))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An overview is given of the role and relevance of Artificial Neural Nets (ANNs) as control systems for autonomous agents. Though ANNs can be used as computational input/output devices, cognition requires not this but rather some method of implementing dynamical systems. A wider class of ANNs incorporating temporal dynamics and feedback is presented, as one way to achieve this. These are difficult to design, and evolutionary approaches are a possible approach. Since evolving complex robot controllers inevitably takes a long time, one cannot afford to start afresh with each new problem, and an incremental adaptation approach will be necessary in the long term. This means that standard off-the-shelf optimising genetic algorithms are not appropriate unless adjusted to their new role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer, R. D.: A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, v. 72, pp. 173–215, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beer, R. D.: The dynamics of adaptive behavior: A research program. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. In Press 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Rob. Autom., v. 2, pp. 14–23, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Funahashi, K. and Y. Nakamura: Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks. Neural Networks, v. 6, pp. 1–64, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey, I.: Untimed and misrepresented: Connectionism and the computer metaphor. Cognitive Science Research Paper CSRP245, University of Sussex, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey, I., P. Husbands, D. Cliff, A. Thompson and N. Jakobi: Evolutionary Robotics: the Sussex approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. In Press 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCulloch, W. S., and W. Pitts: A logical calculus od the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, v. 5, pp. 115–133, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, A.: An evolved circuit, intrinsic in silicon, entwined with physics. To appear: Proceedings of The First International Conference on Evolvable Systems: from Biology to Hardware (ICES96), Tsukuba, Japan, October 7–8 1996. Springer-Verlag LNCS, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Gelder, T.: What might cognition be if not computation. Technical Report 75, Indiana University Cognitive Sciences, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wulfram Gerstner Alain Germond Martin Hasler Jean-Daniel Nicoud

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harvey, I. (1997). Cognition is not computation; Evolution is not optimisation. In: Gerstner, W., Germond, A., Hasler, M., Nicoud, JD. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97. ICANN 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020233

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020233

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63631-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics