Skip to main content

Verification of hybrid systems: Monotonicity in the AHS control system

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Systems III (HS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1066))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Numerous approaches to verifying the safety of vehicles in the AHS architecture of PATH have been proposed (see [1] and [2]). One approach involves finding a boundary between safe and unsafe initial conditions. This task is significantly easier if we can guarantee that the severity of an accident is monotonic in the initial conditions. Simulation results are presented in which it is shown that this condition does not hold for the design of [1], and a hybrid automaton model explaining this situation is presented. Finally, some attempts to modify the control laws to obtain monotonicity are presented.

Research supported by the California PATH program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley under grant MOU-135

Research supported by a University of California Regents Fellowship and by ARO under grant DAAH04-94-G-0026

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Datta Godbole and John Lygeros. Longitudinal control of the lead car of a platoon. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43(4):1125–1135, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anuj Puri and Pravin Varaiya. Driving safely in smart cars. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, pages 3597–3599, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pravin Varaiya. Smart cars on smart roads: Problems of control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-38(2):195–207, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, T. Henzinger, and P. Ho. Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 736. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Deshpande and P. Varaiya. Viable control of hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John A. Haddon, Datta N. Godbole, Akash Deshpande, and John Lygeros. Verification of hybrid systems: Monotonicity in the AHS control system. Memorandum, California PATH Program, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Guckenheimer and Stewart Johnson. Planar hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rajeev Alur Thomas A. Henzinger Eduardo D. Sontag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haddon, J.A., Godbole, D.N., Deshpande, A., Lygeros, J. (1996). Verification of hybrid systems: Monotonicity in the AHS control system. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Sontag, E.D. (eds) Hybrid Systems III. HS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1066. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020943

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020943

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61155-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68334-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics