Skip to main content

A comparison of 4-GL development tools in the area of metadata and dynamic user interfaces

  • 6 Specific Methods and Applications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Aided Systems Theory — EUROCAST'97 (EUROCAST 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1333))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

In conventional information systems the introduction of new kinds of information, new data structures and new layouts of the user interface make an adaptation of the corresponding database application necessary.

In this approach we introduced a concept of metadata information systems in the field of relational databases which reduces the expenditure for software maintenance significantly. With our metadata concept the adaptation can be done by the system administrator without changing the source code of the application. However, the development of metadata based information systems requires development environments which support the generation of user interfaces that may be changed dynamically at application runtime. We analyzed four development environments with respect to their suitability for the design and implementation of database applications which are based on metadata and provide a dynamic user interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sumpter, Raybyne M.: “Draft Whitepaper on Data Management”, Developed from the first two IEEE Metadata Workshops, University of Texas, Austin, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1994, http://www.llnl.gov/liv_comp/metadata/papers/whitepaper-draft.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elmasri, Ramez / Navathe, Shamkant B.: “Fundamentals of Database Systems”, The Benjamin / Cummings Publishing Company, USA 1989, p 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Medyckyj-Scott, D.J. / Newman, I. Ruggles / Walker D. (eds): “Metadata in the Geosciences C”, Group D Publications, Loughborough, UK 1991. ISBN 1-874152-00-4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rubenstrunk, K.: “Standardizing Metadata”, DBMS Database & Client/Server Solutions, 1996 (Volume 9) No. 2, p 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Werthner, H.: “Design Principles of Tourist Information Systems”, Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 1996, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference in Innsbruck, Austria, 1996, Springer Computer Science, Eds. Klein, Schmid, Tjoa, Werthner, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1997, p 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tjoa, A. M. / Werthner, H.: “Interfacing WWW with Distributed Database Applications in the Field of Tourism”, Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 1996, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference in Innsbruck, Austria, 1996, Springer Computer Science, Eds. Klein, Schmid, Tjoa, Werthner, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1997, p 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C/C++, Books Online, Contents Browser Version 2.0, Microsoft Corporation 1993/1994, Portions Corporations M&T Public Inc. 1992–1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MFC, Books Online, Contents Browser Version 2.0, Microsoft Corporation 1993/1994, Portions Corporations M&T Public Inc. 1992–1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krüger,G.: “Visual C++: Einführung in die Windows-Programmierung mit den Microsoft Foundation Classes”, Addison-Wesley, BRD 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgenstern, R. / Oberdorfer, M.: “Visual C++ 1.5 Advanced Programming”, Addison-Wesley, BRD 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Symantec C++ Professional, Microsoft Class Library Reference, Version 6, Microsoft Corporation 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Progress Software Corporation: “Progress Toolset Tutorial”, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Progress Software Corporation: “Progress Programming Handbook”, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Microsoft Corporation: “Microsoft Access — relationale Datenbank für Windows — Sprachverzeichnis”, Microsoft Corporation, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Microsoft Corporation: “Microsoft Access — relationale Datenbank für Windows — Benutzerhandbuch”, Microsoft Corporation, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ring, Bruce: “SQLWindows, Developer's Reference”, Gupta Corporation, Ireland 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ring, Bruce: “SQLBase, Database Adminitrator's Guide”, Gupta Corporation, Ireland 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, P. P.: “The Entity Relationship Model: Towards a unified view of data”, ACM TODS, Vol 1, No 1, 1976, p 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Microsoft Corporation: “ODBC 2.0 programmer's reference and SDK guide: the Microsoft Open Database Standard for Microsoft Windows and Windows NT”, Microsoft-Press, 1994. ISBN 1-556-15658-8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geiger, Kyle: “Inside ODBC', Microsoft-Press, BRD, 1995. ISBN 3-86063-359-7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Franz Pichler Roberto Moreno-Díaz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Küng, J., Wagner, R., Wöß, W. (1997). A comparison of 4-GL development tools in the area of metadata and dynamic user interfaces. In: Pichler, F., Moreno-Díaz, R. (eds) Computer Aided Systems Theory — EUROCAST'97. EUROCAST 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025076

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025076

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63811-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69651-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics