Skip to main content

Analysis of possible genome-dependence of mutation rates in genetic algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Computing (AISB EC 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1143))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1343 Accesses

Abstract

The performance of the evolutionary algorithms depends strongly upon the combined effect of the operators (e.g. mutation) and the mappings from genotype to phenotype space and phenotype to fitness space. We demonstrate, with the example of the canonical Genetic Algorithm (cGA) for parameter optimization, that the right choice of the mutation operator should depend on the genom position and we show that generally point-mutation alone might not be sufficient for the particular binary mapping in the cGA. We take up the idea from Evolution Strategy to mutate via addition of normally distributed random numbers and construct the point-mutation operator in a way to resemble this on average. This concrete approach for genetic algorithms is accompanied by more general remarks on the analysis of evolutionary algorithms in the first and the last section of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thomas Bäck. Self-adaptation in genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, pages 263–271, Paris, France, 1991. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Bäck and Hans-Paul Schwefel. An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):1–23, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Edward Baker. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. In John J. Grefenstette, editor, Proc. 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, pages 101–111, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Hillsdale, NJ, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bronstein and Semendjajew. Taschenbuch der Mathematik. Verlag Harri Deutsch, 23 edition, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Terence C. Fogarty. Varying the probability of mutation in the genetic algorithm. In J. David Schaffer, editor, Proc. 3rd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 104–109, San Mateo, CA, 1989. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jürgen Hesser and Reinhard Männer. Towards an optimal mutation probability for genetic algorithms. In H.-P. Schwefel and Reinhard Männer, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN, pages 23–32. Springer Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhard Sendhoff and Martin Kreutz. Causality and the analysis of evolutionary algorithms, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernhard Sendhoff and Martin Kreutz. Variable, genom-dependent mutation probability for genetic algorithms. Internal Report 95-07, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany, 1995. availabe via WWW: http://www.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ini/VS/PUB-LIST/1995/html/irini95.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Terence C. Fogarty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sendhoff, B., Kreutz, M. (1996). Analysis of possible genome-dependence of mutation rates in genetic algorithms. In: Fogarty, T.C. (eds) Evolutionary Computing. AISB EC 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032788

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032788

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61749-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70671-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics