Skip to main content

A goal directed reasoning for semi-normal default theories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (SBIA 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 991))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 137 Accesses

Abstract

Determining whether a given formula holds in any extension of a Default Logic (DL) theory is called in [8] goal directed reasoning. Reiter [14] presented a goal-directed proof theory for normal default theories. But Reiter and Criscuolo [15] showed that semi-normal defaults were needed in DL to give priorities between defaults to eliminate anomalous extensions. Moreover, Marek and Truszczynski [11] showed that any DL theory can be represented as a seminormal default theory. Etherington [4, 5] developed a forward procedure for constructing default extensions of a subclass of semi-normal default theories. Since a theory may have many extensions, it seems wasteful to compute an entire extension when one is only concerned with goal directed reasoning. Moreover, the given formula may not be contained in the currently computed extension.This paper presents a goal-directed proof theory for semi-normal default theories. A proof of soundness is presented for plain ordered network semi-normal default theories. We show that if there is a proof of a given formula, then an extension containing this formula can be constructed by Etherington's procedure. We also present a goal-directed proof procedure to compute a default proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antoniou, G., Langetepe, E. and Sperschneider, V. 1993. New proofs in default logic theory. Unpublished draft.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou, G., Langetepe, E. and Sperschneider, V. 1993. Computing extensions of default logic-preliminary report LPAR-93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barback, M. D., Lobo, J. 1994. A Resolution-based Procedure for Default Theories with Extensions. Proceedings of the Workshop W5 (with ICLP-94) on Nonmonotonic Extensions of Logic Programming: Theory, Implementation and Applications, S. Margherita Ligure, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Besnard, P. 1989. An introduction to default logic. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etherington, D. W. 1988. Reasoning with Incomplete Information, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Etherington, D.W. 1987. Formalizing Nonmonotonic Reasoning Systems. Artificial Intelligence 31:41–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerreiro, R. A. T., Casanova, M. A. and Hemerly, A. S. 1990. Contributions to a Proof Theory for Generic Defaults, Proc. 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Junker, U. and Konolige, K. 1990. Computing the extensions of autoepistemic and default logic with a TMS. In Proc. of AAAI-90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kautz, H. A., Selman, B. 1989. Hard Problems for Simple Default Logics. Proc 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and reasoning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lukasziewicz, W. 1990. Nonmonotonic Reasoning: formalization of commonsense reasoning. Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lukasziewicz, W. 1988. Considerations on Default Logic. Computational Intelligence, 4, pp 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marek, W., Truszczynski, M.: Nonmonotonic logic: context dependent reasoning. Springer Verlag 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poole, D. L. 1987. A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 36, pp 27–47.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Poole, D. L. Goebel, R. and Aleluinas, R. 1987. Theorist: a logic reasoning system for defaults and diagnosis. N. Cercone and G. McCalla (eds). The Knowledge Frontier Essays in the representation of Knowledge, Springer Verlag, New York, pp 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiter, R. 1980. A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, pp. 81–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Reiter, G. Criscuolo: Some representational issues in default reasoning. J. Computers and Maths. with Appls.9 (1983) 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothschild, A. and Schaub, T. 1993. A computational approach to default logics. Proc. of Dutch / German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning Techniques and Their Applications, eds. Brewka, G and Witteveen, C.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schwind, C. B. and Risch, V. 1991. A tableaux-based characterization for default logic. In R. Kruse, editor, Proc. of European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty, pp. 310–317, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Zaverucha: A Prioritized Contextual Default Logic: Curing Anomalous Extensions with a Simple Abnormality Default Theory. In:Bernhard Nebel and Leonie Dreschler-Fischer, eds. Proc. KI-94, Saarbrucken, Germany, LNAI 861 (Springer 1994) 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Zaverucha: On Cumulative Default Logic With Filters. Submitted (also Technical Report ES-321/94, COPPE/ UFRJ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, A. and Marek, W. 1990. On the classification and existence of structures in default logic. Fundamente Informaticae 8(4), pp. 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jacques Wainer Ariadne Carvalho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zaverucha, G., Veloso, S.R.M. (1995). A goal directed reasoning for semi-normal default theories. In: Wainer, J., Carvalho, A. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. SBIA 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 991. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034804

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034804

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60436-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47467-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics