Skip to main content

Data analysis: How to compare Kohonen neural networks to other techniques?

  • Applications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 540))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Neural networks, as a new computational technique, require a comparison of performances to classical techniques. This fundamental research thought appears complicated when it applies to real problems. In this paper, we outline the behaviour of three different algorithms to a common problem of data analysis: the Kohonen self-organization, the classical Principal Component Analysis and the Generalized Hebbian Algorithm. Then, we attempt to give a qualitative comparison of the results and we discuss the difficulty to correctly achieve this step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6-References

  • Baumann, T., Germond, A., Tschudi, D. (1991), Impulse test fault diagnosis on power transformers using Kohonen's self-organizing neural network, Proc. of the Third Symp. on Expert System Applications to power systems, Tokyo & Kobe, April 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouroche, J.M., Saporta, G., (1987), L'analyse de données, Coll. Que sais-je ?, Presses Universitaires de France, 3ème Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherkassky, V., Lari-Najafi, H. (1990), Self-organizing neural network for non-parametric regression analysis, Int. Neural Network Conf, 1, pp. 370–374, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, M., Fort, J.C., (1987), Etude d'un processus d'auto-organisation. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, 23, 1, pp. 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutten, C., Guérin, A., Nguyen Thi, H.L., (1991), Adaptive optimization of neural algorithms, to appear in International Workshop on Artificial Neural Networks, Grenada, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. (1982), Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cyb. 43, 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Oja, E., (1982), A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. Journal of mathematical biology 15, 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontier, J., Dufour, A-B., Normand, M., (1990), Le modèle euclidien en analyses de données, Editions Ellipses, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, H. Schulten, K, (1988), “Kohonen's self-organizing maps: exploring their computational capabilities”, Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, pp.I–109, 1–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, A., (1989), Optimal unsupervised learning in a single layer linear feedforward neural network, Neural Networks 2, 459–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Windser, C., Harker, A., (1990), Multi-variate financial index prediction — A neural network study, Int. Neural Network Conf, 1, pp. 357–360, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alberto Prieto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blayo, F., Demartines, P. (1991). Data analysis: How to compare Kohonen neural networks to other techniques?. In: Prieto, A. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks. IWANN 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 540. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035929

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035929

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54537-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38460-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics