Skip to main content

An empirical investigation of an evolutionary algorithm's ability to maintain a known good solution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Programming VII (EP 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1447))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

We analyze the disruptiveness of four operators in an evolutionary algorithm(EA) solving a grammar induction problem. The EA in question contains mutation, crossover, inversion, and substitution operators. Grammars are encoded on genotypes in a representation which includes variable-length introns. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with four factors, the four operators' rates, is used. It is discovered that crossover and mutation rates interact, meaning that their effects on the EA's performance when used together are more than the sum of their individual effects. This suggests that operators should be studied in combination, instead of in isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. L. Bailey and C. Elkan, “Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp. 28–36. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Charniak. Statistical Language Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Dawson-Saunders and R. G. Trapp. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut, second edition 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. E. Kammeyer and R. K. Belew, “Stochastic Context-free Grammar Induction with a Genetic Algorithm using Local Search,” Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 4. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. B. McCall. Fundamental Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, San Diego, CA, fourth edition 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Schwehm and A. Ost, “Inference of Stochastic Regular Grammars by Massively Parallel Genetic Algorithms,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. A. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Wyard, “Context Free Grammar Induction Using Genetic Algorithms,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Wyard, “Representational Issues for Context-Free Grammar Induction Using Genetic Algorithms,” technical report, British Telecom, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

V. W. Porto N. Saravanan D. Waagen A. E. Eiben

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kammeyer, T.E., Belew, R.K. (1998). An empirical investigation of an evolutionary algorithm's ability to maintain a known good solution. In: Porto, V.W., Saravanan, N., Waagen, D., Eiben, A.E. (eds) Evolutionary Programming VII. EP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1447. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0040827

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0040827

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64891-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68515-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics