Skip to main content

Exploring the effect of layout on reading from screen

  • Part II: Common RIDT'98 and EP'98 Session
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Publishing, Artistic Imaging, and Digital Typography (RIDT 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1375))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper briefly examines the nature of information available to people designing for the screen and proposes that applied research into factors that affect the legibility of text on screen is required. Comparisons of reading from paper and screen do not identify the optimal typographic conditions for reading from screen, and it may be more fruitful to abandon such comparisons. A series of experiments that investigate the effect of typographic layout on reading from screen are summarised. The description aims to be accessible to practitioners and therefore to provide a basis for informed design decisions. The inappropriateness of formulating simple guidelines is illustrated by the results of these experiments. Peoples' subjective views of what are the easiest layouts to read are not those read fastest.

This research was supported with a grant from Microsoft Corporation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black A., Boag A. Choosing binary or grayscale bitmaps: some consequences for users. EP92, Proceedings of Electronic Publishing (Eds. C. Vanoirbeek, G. Coray), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) 247–260

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter R.H.S. Movements of the eye, Pion, London (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Bruijn D., de Mul S., van Oostendorp H. The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text. Behaviour and Information Technology 11(2) (1992) 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duchnicky R.L., Kolers P.A. Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors 25(6) (1983) 683–692

    Google Scholar 

  5. Floridi L. Internet: which future for organized knowledge, Frankenstein or Pygmalion? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 (1995) 261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould J.D., Alfaro L., Barnes V., Finn R., Grischkowsky N., Minuto A. Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper: attempts to isolate a single-variable explanation. Human Factors 29(3) (1987) 269–299

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartley J. Designing instructional text, Kogan Page, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morris R. A., Berry K., Hargreaves K. A. Towards quantification of the effects of typographic variation on readability. SID International Symposium: digest of technical papers 24 (1993) 64–70

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muter P., Latrémouille S.A., Treurniet W.C., Beam P. Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors 24(5) (1982) 501–508

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muter P., Maurutto P. Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? Behaviour and Information Technology 10(4) (1991) 257–266

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niederst J. Designing for the web, O'Reilly, Bonn (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oborne DJ., Holton D. Reading from screen versus paper: there is no difference. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28 (1988) 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H., Benyon D., Holland S., Carey T. Human-computer interaction, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale N.J. (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds L. The functional use of colour on visual display units: air traffic control displays. Information Design Journal 8(2) (1996) 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson J., Dillon A., McKnight C. The effect of window size on reading and manipulating electronic text. Contemporary Ergonomics 1989 (Ed. E.D. Megaw), Taylor and Francis, London (1989) 474–479

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rivlin C., Lewis R., Davies Cooper R. Guidelines for screen design, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spencer H. The visible word, RCA, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tinker M.A. Legibility of print, Iowa State University Press, Iowa (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Travis D. Effective color displays: theory and practice, Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Twyman M. The graphic presentation of language. Information Design Journal 3(1) (1982) 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Nes F.L. Space, colour and typography on visual display terminals. Behaviour and Information Technology 5(2) (1986) 99–118

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams M.A. Legibility of serif and sans serif type faces in computer displays, Master of Science thesis, Colorado State University (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roger D. Hersch Jacques André Heather Brown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dyson, M.C., Kipping, G.J. (1998). Exploring the effect of layout on reading from screen. In: Hersch, R.D., André, J., Brown, H. (eds) Electronic Publishing, Artistic Imaging, and Digital Typography. RIDT 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053278

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053278

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64298-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69718-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics