Skip to main content

Meaning helps learning syntax

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Grammatical Inference (ICGI 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1433))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new framework for the computational learning of formal grammars with positive data. In this model, both syntactic and semantic information are taken into account, which seems cognitively relevant for the modeling of natural language learning. The syntactic formalism used is the one of Lambek categorial grammars and meaning is represented with logical formulas. The principle of compositionality is admitted and defined as an isomorphism applying to trees and allowing to automatically translate sentences into their semantic representation(s). Simple simulations of a learning algorithm are extensively developed and discussed.

This research was partially supported by “Motricité et cognition”: contrat par objectifs de la région Nord/Pas de Calais and basic ideas of this paper were presented at the Workshop on Paradigms and Grounding in Language Learning of the conference Computational Natural Language Leaning 98.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. W. Adriaans, Language Learning from a Categorial Perspective, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. Anderson, “Induction of Augmented Transition Networks”, Cognitive Science 1, p125–157, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Buszkowski, G. Penn, “Categorial grammars determined from linguistic data by unification”, Studia Logica 49, p431–454, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Chomsky, Language and Mind, Brace & World, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Denis, R. Gilleron, “PAC learning under helpful distributions”, Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, p132–145, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. R. Dowty, R. E. Wall, S. Peters, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Finkel, I. Tellier: “A polynomial algorithm for the membership problem with categorial grammars”, Theoretical Computer Science 164, p207–221, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E. M. Gold, “Language Identification in the Limit”, Information and Control 10, P447–474, 1967.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Hamburger, K. Wexler, “A mathematical Theory of Learning Transformational Grammar”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12, p137–177, 1975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. C. Hill, “A computational model of language acquisition in the two-year-old”, Cognition and Brain Theory 6(3), p287–317, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kanazawa, “Identification in the Limit of Categorial Grammars”, Journal of Logic, Language & Information, vol 5, nℴ2, p115–155, 1996.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lambek, “The mathematics of Sentence Structure”, American Mathematical Monthly, nℴ65, p154–170, 1958.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Langley, “Language acquisition through error discovery”, Cognition and Brain Theory 5, p211–255, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Li, P. Vitanyi, “A theory of learning simple concepts under simple distributions”, SIAM J. Computing, 20(5), p915–935, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Montague, Formal Philosophy; Selected papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Moortgat, Categorial investigations, logical and linguistic aspects of the Lambek Calculus, Foris, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. T. Oehrle, E. Bach, D. Wheeler (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structure, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Pentus, “Lambek grammars are context-free”, in: 8th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Montreal, Canada, p429–433, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Pinker, “Formal models of language learning”, Cognition 7, p217–283, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Sakakibara, “Efficient learning of context-free grammars from positive structural examples”, Information & Computation 97, p23–60, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Schieber, “Evidence against the context-freeness of natural languages”, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, p333–343, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Shinohara, “Inductive inference of monotonic formal systems from positive data”, p339–351 in: Algorithmic Learning Theory, S. Arikara, S. Goto, S. Ohsuga & T. Yokomori (eds), Tokyo: Ohmsha and New York and Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. G. Valiant, “A theory of the learnable”, Communication of the ACM, p1134–1142, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Wexler, P. Culicover, Formal Principles of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Zielonka, “Axiomatizability of Ajdukiewicz-Lambek calculus by means of cancellations schemes”, Zeischrift für Mathematsche Logik und grunlagen der Mathematik 27, p215–224, 1981.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Vasant Honavar Giora Slutzki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tellier, I. (1998). Meaning helps learning syntax. In: Honavar, V., Slutzki, G. (eds) Grammatical Inference. ICGI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1433. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054061

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054061

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64776-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68707-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics