Skip to main content

A logical framework for modeling a discourse from the point of view of the agents involved in It

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Theory, Tools and Applications (ICCS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1453))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The way people interpret a discourse in real life goes well beyond the traditional semantic interpretation based on predicate calculus as is currently done in approaches such as Sowa's Conceptual Graph Theory, Kamp's DRT. From a cognitive point of view, understanding a story is not a mere process of identifying truth conditions of a series of sentences, but i s a construction process of building several partial models such as a model of the environment in which the story takes place, a model of mental attitudes for each character and a model of the verbal interactions taking place in the story. Based on this cognitive basis, we propose a logical framework differentiating three components in an agent's mental model: a temporal model which simulates an agent's experience of the passing of time; the agent's memory model which records the explicit mental attitudes the agent is aware of and the agent's attentional model containing the knowledge structures that the agent manipulates in its current situation.

An extended version of this paper can be found in reference [11]. This research is sponsored by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada and FCAR. My apologies to the reviewers because I could not answer all their questions in such a short paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen P. R.& Levesque H. J. (1990), Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication, in Cohen P.R., Morgan J. & Pollack M. E.(edts.) (1990), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, 221–255.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duchan J. F., Bruder G.A. & Hewitt L.E. (1995), Deixis in Narrative, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson E. A. (1990), Temporal and modal logic, In van Leeuwen J. (edt), Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, North Holland, Amsterdam, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fagin R., Halpern J.Y., Moses Y. & Vardi M.Y., Reasoning about Knowledge, MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haddadi A. (1995), Communication and Cooperation in Agent Systems, Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in AI n. 1056.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kripke S. (1963), Semantical considerations on modal logic, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol 16, 83–89.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore R.C. (1995), Logic and Representation, CSLI Lecture Notes, n. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moulin B. (1992), A conceptual graph approach for representing temporal information in discourse, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol5 n3, 183–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Moulin B. (1993), The representation of linguistic information in an approach used for modelling temporal knowledge in discourses. In Mineau G. W., Moulin B. & Sowa J. F. (eds.), Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge representation, Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, Springer Verlag, 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin B. (1997), Temporal contexts for discourse representation: an extension of the conceptual graph approach, the Journal of Applied Intelligence, vol 7 n3, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moulin B. (1998), A logical framework for modeling a discourse from the point of view of the agents involved in it, Res. Rep. DIUL-RR 98-03, Laval Univ., 16 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moulin B., Rousseau D.& Lapalme G. (1994), A Multi-Agent Approach for Modeling Conversations, Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language, Paris, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao A.S.& Georgeff M. P. (1991), Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture, In proceedings of KR'91 Conference, Cambridge, Mass, 473–484.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segal E.M. (1995a), Narrative comprehension and the role of Deictic Shift Theory, in [2], 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Segal E.M. (1995b), A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative, in [2], 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sowa J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures. Reading Mass: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marie-Laure Mugnier Michel Chein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moulin, B. (1998). A logical framework for modeling a discourse from the point of view of the agents involved in It. In: Mugnier, ML., Chein, M. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Theory, Tools and Applications. ICCS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1453. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054927

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054927

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64791-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68673-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics