Skip to main content

Computational processing of verbal polysemy with conceptual structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Theory, Tools and Applications (ICCS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1453))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our work takes place in the general framework of lexicosemantic knowledge representation to be used by a Natural Language Understanding system. More specifically, we were interested in an adequate modelling of verb descriptions allowing to interpret semantic incoherence due to verbal polysemy. The main goal is to realise a module which is able to detect and to deal with figurative meanings. Therefore, we first propose a lexico-semantic knowledge base; then we present the processes allowing to determine the different meanings which may be associated to a given predicate, and to discriminate these meanings for a given sentence. Each verb is defined by a basic action (its supertype) specified by the case relations allowing to specify it (its definition graph), that means the object, mean, manner, goal and/or result relations which distinguish the described verb meaning from the specified basic action. This description is recursive: the basic actions are in turn defined using more general actions. To help interpreting the different meanings conveyed by a verb and its hyponyms, we have determined three major types of heuristics consisting in searching the type lattice, and/or examining the associated definitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chibout, K., Masson, N.: Un réseau lexico-sémantique de verbes construit à partir du dictionnaire pour le traitement informatique du français, Actes du colloque LTT-AUPELF-UREF Lexicomatique et Dictionnairique, Lyon, Septembre 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Les métaphores dans la vie quotidienne. Collection ”Propositions”, les éditions de Minuit (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levin, B.: English verb classes and alternations, University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, R.: Pour une logique du sens. Linguistique nouvelle. Presses Universitaires de France, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, A. G., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D.: WORDNET a Lexical Database Organised on Psycholinguistic Principles, in Zernik (Ed.): Proceedings of the First International Lexical Acquisition Workshop, I.J.C.A.I., Détroit,(1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Searle, J.R.: Metaphor in Andrew Ortony (Ed.): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press (1979), pp. 284–324.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sowa J. Conceptual Structures: processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley. Reading, Massachussetts, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vapillon J., Briffault X., Sabah G., Chibout K.: An object oriented linguistic engineering using LFG and CG, ACL/EACL Workshop: Computational Environments for Grammar Development and Linguistic Engineering, Madrid (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marie-Laure Mugnier Michel Chein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chibout, K., Vilnat, A. (1998). Computational processing of verbal polysemy with conceptual structures. In: Mugnier, ML., Chein, M. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Theory, Tools and Applications. ICCS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1453. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054928

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054928

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64791-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68673-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics