Skip to main content

Analyzing the roles of problem solving and learning in organizational-learning oriented classifier system

  • Multi Agent Architecture
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1531))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper analyzes the roles of problem solving and learning in Organizational-learning oriented Classifier System (OCS) from the viewpoint of organizational learning in organization and management sciences, and validates the effectiveness of the roles through the experiments of large scale problem for Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) re-design in the Computer Aided Design (CAD). OCS is a novel multiagent-based architecture, and is composed of the following four mechanisms: (1) reinforcement learning, (2) rule generation, (3) rule exchange, and (4) organizational knowledge utilization. In this paper, we discuss that the four mechanisms in OCS work respectively as an individual performance/concept learning and an organizational performance/concept learning in organization and management sciences. Through the intensive experiments on the re-design problems of real scale PCBs, the results suggested that four learning mechanisms in individual/organizational levels contribute to finding not only feasible part placements in fewer iterations but also the shorter total wiring length than the one by human experts.

Paper submitted to the 5th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI ’98)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Argyris and D.A. Schon: Organizational Learning, Addison-Wesley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.H. Bond and L.Gasser: Reading in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Duncan and A. Weiss: “Organizational Learning: Implications for organizational design”, in Research in organizational behavior, B.M. Staw (Ed.), Vol. 1, JAI Press, pp. 75–123, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Espejo, W. Schuhmann, M. Schwaninger and U. Bilello: “Organizational Transformation and Learning”, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.J. Grefenstette: “Credit Assignment in Rule Discovery Systems Base on Genetic Algorithms”, Machine Learning, Vol. 3, pp. 225–245, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.E. Goldberg: “Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning”, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Hirahara, N. Oka and K. Yoshida:, “Automatic placement using static and dynamic groupings”, Engineering Design & Automation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 167–178, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. Holland and J. Reitman: “Cognitive Systems Based on Adaptive Algorithms”, in Pattern Directed Inference System, D.A. Waterman and F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kim: “The Link between individual and organizational learning”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp. 37–50, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.G. March. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 71–87, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Miyazaki, M. Yamamura and S. Kobayashi: “On the Rationality of Profit Sharing in Reinforcement Learning”, IIZUKA ’94, pp. 285–288, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Sechen and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli: “The Timber Wolf Placement and Routing package” IEEE Journal Solid-State Circuits, SC-20,2, pp. 510–522, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S.F. Smith: “Flexible learning of problem solving heuristics through adaptive search”, IJCAI ’83, pp. 422–425, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.S. Sutton, A.G. Bart: Reinforcement Learning—An Introduction-, The MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Takadama, S. Nakasuka and T. Terano: “Printed Circuit Board Design via Organizational-Learning Agents”, Applied Intelligence: Special Issue on Intelligent Adaptive Agents, 1998, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Takadama, K. Hajiri, T. Nomura, M. Okada, S. Nakasuka and K. Shimohara: “Learning Model for Adaptive Behaviors as an Organized Group of Swarm Robots”, International Journal of Artificial Life and Robotics, 1998, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Yoshimura: “Knowledge-based placement and routing system for printed circuit board”, PRICAI ’90, pp. 116–121, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Yoshikawa, T. Furuhashi and Y. Uchikawa: “Coding Methods for Automatic Placement of Parts on Printed Circuit Boards” (in Japanese), Trans. of The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, Vol. 115-D, No. 5, pp 642–651, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hing-Yan Lee Hiroshi Motoda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Takadama, K., Nakasuka, S., Terano, T. (1998). Analyzing the roles of problem solving and learning in organizational-learning oriented classifier system. In: Lee, HY., Motoda, H. (eds) PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095259

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095259

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65271-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49461-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics