Abstract
The problem of formalising continuous change within reasoning about action systems such as the situation calculus has recently been receiving increasing attention([Rei96] [MS96]). In this paper we show that a long-existing systems theoretic reasoning methodology, that of Zeigler’s DEVS (discrete event system specification), not only subsumes the standard situation calculus but is able to elegantly describe continuous change within a discrete description structure. We demonstrate that on the semantic level both Reiter’s recent formalisation of continuous change within the situation calculus, and Miller and Shanahan’s formalisation of continuous change within the event calculus fit neatly into a DEVS framework. Our results not only evince a significant connection between logic-based action formalisms and the algebraic formalism of systems theory, and between reasoning about action and discrete event simulation, but also provides support for using DEVS—a well-studied and rigorously implemented framework—as an underlying semantic framework for reasoning about action formalisms.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M Gelfond and V Lifshitz. Representing actions in extended logic programs. In Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, 1992.
Michael Gelfond, Vladimir Lifshitz, and A. Rabinov. What are the limitations of the situation calculus? In R. Boyer, editor, Essays in honour of Woody Bledsoe. Kluwer, 1991.
R. A. Kowalski and W. J. Sergot. A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing, 4:67–95, 1986.
John McCarthy and Patrick J. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial int elligence. Machine Intelligence, 4:463–502, 1969.
Rob Miller and Murray Shanahan. Narratives in the situation calculus. Journal of Logic & Computation, 4(5):513–530, October 1994.
Rob Miller and Murray Shanahan. Reasoning about discontinuities in the event calculus. In KR ’96. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.
Javier Pinto and Raymond Reiter. Reasoning about time in the situation calculus. Annals of Mathematical and Artifical Intelligence, 14:251–268, September 1995.
Raymond Reiter. Natural actions, concurrency and continous time in the situation calculus. In KR ’96, 1996.
Erik Sandewall. Filter preferential entailmentfor the logic of action in almost con tinuous worlds. In Proceedings of IJCAI ’89. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.
Erik Sandewall. Features and Fluents. Oxford University Press, 1994.
Murray Shanahan. Solving the Frame Problem. MIT Press. 1997.
Bernard P. Zeigler. Theory of Modelling and Simulation. Wiley, New York, 1976.
Bernard P. Zeigler. Object-oriented simulation with hierarchical, modular models: intelligent agents and endomorphic systems. Academic Press, Boston, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
O’Neill, T., Foo, N. (1998). Reasoning about continuous change. In: Lee, HY., Motoda, H. (eds) PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095278
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095278
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65271-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49461-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive