Skip to main content
Log in

XGobi vs the C2: Results of an experiment comparing data visualization in a 3-D immersive virtual reality environment with a 2-D workstation display

  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Virtual environments are an emerging technology, which make use of 3-D display devices. Currently very little research into using this new technology for statistical graphics has been done. In association with the Iowa Center for Emerging Manufacturing Technology we have been building a statistical graphics application in the highly immersive C2 environment, called VR-Gobi. This paper describes an experiment conducted to determine if the new technology provides an improved exploratory data analysis environment over traditional workstation graphics environments, such as XGobi. A good analogy comparing the difference between the two environments is that one is like a desk and the other like a room. The visualization tasks we compare between the two environments are detecting clusters, dimensionality and radial sparseness in high-dimensional data, and we also compare the ease of interaction between the computer and human user in the two environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. UNIX is a registered trademark of UNIX Systems Laboratories.

  2. X Window System is a trademark of MIT.

References

  • Asimov, D. (1985), ‘The Grand Tour: A Tool for Viewing Multidimensional Data’, SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing 6(1), 128–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buja, A. & Asimov, D. (1986), Grand Tour Methods: An Outline, in D. M. Allen, ed., ‘Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on the Interface between Computing Science and Statistics’, Elsevier, Lexington, KY, pp. 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buja, A., Cook, D., Asimov, D. & Hurley, C. (1997), Dynamic Projections in High-Dimensional Visualization: Theory and Computational Methods, Technical report, AT&T Labs, Florham Park, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. B., Wegman, E. J. & Luo, Q. (1996), ExplorN: Design considerations past and present, Technical Report 129, Center for Computational Statistics, George Mason University.

  • Cook, D. & Buja, A. (1997), ‘Manual Controls For High-Dimensional Data Projections’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 4(6), 464–480. Also see www.public.iastate.edu/~dicook/research/papers/manip.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., Buja, A., Cabrera, J. & Hurley, C. (1995), ‘Grand Tour and Projection Pursuit’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 4(3), 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Neira, C, Sandin, D. J. & DeFanti, T. A. (1993), Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The design and Implementation of the CAVE, in ‘ACM SIGGRAPH’ 93 Proceedings’, Anaheim, CA, pp. 135–142.

  • Härdie, W., Klinke, S. & Turlach, B. A. (1995), XploRe: An Interactive Statistical Computing Environment, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, C. & Buja, A. (1990), ‘Analyzing High-Dimensional Data with Motion Graphics’, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 11(6), 1193–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, C. (1978), Graphical From Alpha to Omega in Data Analysis, in P. C. C. Wang, ed., ‘Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data’, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 59–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swayne, D. F., Cook, D. & Buja, A. (1998), ‘XGobi: Interactive Dynamic Graphics in the X Window System’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7(1), 113–130. See also www.research.att.com/~andreas/xgobi/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symanzik, J., Cook, D., Kohlmeyer, B. D., Lechner, U. & Cruz-Neira, C. (1997), ‘Dynamic Statistical Graphics in the C2 Virtual Reality Environment’, Computing Science and Statistics 29(2), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1991), LispStat: An Object-Orientated Environment for Statistical Computing and Dynamic Graphics, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Teylingen, R., Ribarsky, W. & Van Der Mast, C. (1997), ‘Virtual Data Visualizer’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 3(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegman, E. J. (1991), The Grand Tour in k-Dimensions, Technical Report 68, Center for Computational Statistics, George Mason University.

  • Wegman, E. J. & Carr, D. B. (1993), Statistical Graphics and Visualization, in C. R. Rao, ed., ‘Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 9’, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 857–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, G. (1998), ‘Selection: 524,288 Ways to Say ‘This is Interesting”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. Forthcoming.

Download references

8 Acknowledgments

The research reported in this article has been funded by the National Science Foundation grant DMS9632662.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, L., Cook, D. & Cruz-Neira, C. XGobi vs the C2: Results of an experiment comparing data visualization in a 3-D immersive virtual reality environment with a 2-D workstation display. Computational Statistics 14, 39–51 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022704

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022704

Keywords

Navigation