Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic Modulation Recognition Based on Morphological Operations

  • Short Paper
  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatic modulation recognition under negative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) environment is a challenging topic. In this paper, we propose the method consisting of two main steps: constructing a template library and recognition. The former extracts the morphological envelope of each signal power spectrum by using the morphological close–open operation to construct the template library. The latter can further be divided into two sub steps. The first sub-step is to calculate the similarities between the morphological envelope of received signal power spectrum and each template in the template library. The second one is to determine the modulation type of received signal based on the maximum of the similarities which are more than the threshold. Simulation results demonstrate that the correct recognition rate (CRR) can increase by 0.84 % and 9.38 % with hierarchical method and ZAM-GTFR method at SNR=−4 dB, respectively. The proposed method can reduce the computational complexity by about 97 % compared with the ZAM-GTFR method when N≤4096. The results prove the method has the advantage of high CRR and the less computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.E. Azzouz, A.K. Nandi, Automatic identification of digital modulation types. Signal Process. 47, 55–69 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Boutte, B. Santhanam, A hybrid ICA-SVM approach to continuous phase modulation recognition. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 16, 402–405 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ebrahimzadeh, A. Ranjbar, Intelligent digital signal type identification. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 21(4), 569–577 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.L. Gao, Z.Z. Zhang, Modulation recognition based on combined feature parameter and modified probabilistic neural network, in Proc. Sixth World Congress on Intelligence Control and Automation, June 21–23, Dalian, China (2006), pp. 2954–2958

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Hassan, I. Dayoub, W. Hamouda, M. Berbineau, Automatic modulation recognition using wavelet transform and neural networks in wireless systems. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 234–238 (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/532898

  6. S.-Z. Hsue, S.S. Soliman, Automatic modulation classification using zero-crossing. IEE Proc., F, Radar Signal Process. 137(6), 459–464 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B.G. Mobasseri, Digital modulation classification using constellation shape. Signal Process. 80, 251–277 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S.U. Pawar, J.F. Doherty, Modulation recognition in continuous phase modulation using approximate entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 6, 843–851 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.E. Sherme, A novel method for automatic modulation recognition. Appl. Soft Comput. 12, 453–461 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Sue, L.X. Jefferson, Z. Mengchou, Real-time modulation classification based on maximum likelihood. IEEE Commun. Lett. 12, 801–803 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.M. Udrea, N. Vizireanu, Iterative generalization of morphological skeleton. J. Electron. Imaging 16(1), 010501 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Vizireanu, R. Udrea, Visual-oriented morphological foreground content grayscale frames interpolation method. J. Electron. Imaging 18, 020502 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D.N. Vizireanu, C. Pirnog, V. Lãzãrescu, A. Vizireanu, The skeleton structure—an improved compression algorithm with perfect reconstruction. J. Digit. Imaging 14(2), 241–242 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Wei, J.M. Mendel, Maximum-likelihood classification for digital amplitude-phase modulations. IEEE Trans. Commun. 48, 189–193 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Wu, M.O. Ahmad, A discriminant model for the pattern recognition of linearly independent samples. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 31, 669–687 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Q.M. Zeng, J.H. Liao, Q.H. Wu, A novel mathematical morphology filter for the accurate fault location in power transmission lines, in IEEE Region 10 Conf. TENCON (2009), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Zeng, H. Xiong, J. Wang, B. Tang, An approach to intra-pulse modulation recognition based on the ambiguity function. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 29, 1103–1122 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Zeng, X. Zeng, G. Lu, B. Tang, Automatic modulation classification of radar signals using the generalised time-frequency representation of Zhao, Atlas and Marks. IET Radar Sonar Navig. 5, 507–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Zhang, H.P. Wang, A new approach of pitch detection based on morphology filter and wavelet transform, in Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, vol. 1 (2010), pp. 751–753

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Zhou, R. Liang, L. Zhao, C. Zou, Whisper intelligibility enhancement using a supervised learning approach. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 31(6), 2061–2074 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Ma, X. & Cao, D. Automatic Modulation Recognition Based on Morphological Operations. Circuits Syst Signal Process 32, 2517–2525 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-013-9577-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-013-9577-4

Keywords

Navigation