Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Performance Study of Dynamic Fractors in Any of the Four Quadrants

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fractor is a simple fractional-order system. Its transfer function is \(1/Fs^{\alpha }\); the coefficient, F, is called the fractance, and \(\alpha \) is called the exponent of the fractor. This paper presents how a fractor can be realized, using RC ladder circuit, meeting the predefined specifications on both F and \(\alpha \). Besides, commonly reported fractors have \(\alpha \) between 0 and 1. So, their constant phase angles (CPA) are always restricted between \(0^{\circ }\) and \(-90^{\circ }\). This work has employed GIC topology to realize fractors from any of the four quadrants, which means fractors with \(\alpha \) between \(-\)2 and +2. Hence, one can achieve any desired CPA between \(+180^{\circ }\) and \(-180^{\circ }\). The paper also exhibits how these GIC parameters can be used to tune the fractance of emulated fractors in real time, thus realizing dynamic fractors. In this work, a number of fractors are developed as per proposed technique, their impedance characteristics are studied, and fractance values are tuned experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At \(\alpha = 0,\ +1,\ -1\) fractor is resistor, capacitor, inductor, respectively.

  2. Ideally, fractor is a CPE. Its phase angle is constant at \(-90\alpha \) degree for any frequency. But, practically realized fractor shows CP in limited frequency zone, called CP zone or bandwidth, and within that CP zone also, fractor phase oscillates a little. Measure of this oscillation is called phase ripple.

  3. It is worth to mention that the circuit structure has been adopted from the work of Oldham and Zoski [27]. But that work [27] meets the specifications on the exponent (\(\alpha \)) only not on the coefficient (F). In this work, fractors are realized to meet three different specifications, \(\alpha \), F, and bandwidth (\(f_\mathrm{L}\),\(f_\mathrm{U}\)) simultaneously.

  4. Gradient of the magnitude plot in log-log plane is a measure of \(\alpha \) as \( log |Z|=-log F- \alpha (log \omega )\).

References

  1. A. Adhikary, M. Khanra, S. Sen, K. Biswas, Realization of a carbon nanotube based electrochemical fractor. in International Symposium Circuits System, Lisbon, Portugal (2015)

  2. A. Arikoglu, A new fractional derivative model for linearly viscoelastic materials and parameter identification via genetic algorithms. Rheol. Acta 53(3), 219–233 (2014)

  3. E. Barsoukav, J.R. Macdonald, Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications, 2nd edn. (Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Biswas, S. Sen, P.K. Dutta, Realization of a constant phase element and its performance study in a differentiator circuit. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 53(9), 802–806 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.W. Bohannan, Analog fractional order controller in temperature and motor control applications. J. Vib. Control 14(9–10), 1487–1498 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Caponetto, S. Graziani, F.L. Pappalardo, F. Sapuppo, Experimental characterization of ionic polymer metal composite as a novel fractional order element. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013, 10 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. G.E. Carlson, C.A. Halijak, Approximation of fractional capacitors (1/s)\(^{(1/n)}\) by a regular newton process. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 11(2), 210–213 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Dana, I. Clara-Mihaela, D.K. Robain, Modelling drug interaction using a fractional order pharmacokinetic model. in Proceedings of International Conference Fractional Differentiation and its Application, Catania, Italy, p. 6 (2014)

  9. L. Dorcak, J. Valsa, E. Gonzalez, J. Terpak, I. Petra, L. Pivka, Analogue realization of fractional-order dynamical systems. Entropy 15, 4199–4214 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A.M. Elshurafa, M.N. Almadhoun, K.N. Salama, H.N. Alshareef, Microscale electrostatic fractional capacitors using reduced graphene oxide percolated polymer composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 232901 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Elwakil, Fractional-order circuits and systems: an emerging interdisciplinary research area. Circuits Syst. Mag. IEEE 10(4), 40–50 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Fortuna, G. Nunari, F. Cannavo, Further evidences of self-organized criticality in volcanology. in Proceedings of International Conference Fractional Differentiation and its Application, Catania, Italy, p. 6 (2014)

  13. T.J. Freeborn, A survey of fractional-order circuit models for biology and biomedicine. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 3(3), 416–423 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.D. Gabano, T. Poinot, H. Kanoun, Identification of a thermal system using continuous linear parameter-varying fractional modeling. Control Theory Appl. 5, 889–899 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. E.A. Gonzalez, L. Dorcak, C.A. Monje, J. Valsa, F.S. Caluyo, I. Petras, Conceptual design of a selectable fractional-order differentiator for industrial applications. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 17(3), 697–716 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. T.C. Haba, G. Ablart, T. Camps, F. Olivie, Influence of the electrical parameters on the input impedance of a fractal structure realised on silicon. Chaos Solitons Fractals 24, 479–490 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.M. Ionescu, J.A.T. Machado, R.D. Keyser, Modeling of the lung impedance using a fractional-order ladder network with constant phase elements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 5(1), 83–89 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I.S. Jesus, J.A.T. Machado, Development of fractional order capacitors based on electrolyte processes. Nonlinear Dyn. 56, 45–55 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Lasia, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and its Applications, vol. 32 (Kluwer, New York, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Lazovic, Z. Vosika, M. Lazarevic, J. Simic-Krstic, D. Koruga, Modeling of bioimpedance for human skin based on fractional distributed order modified cole model. FME Trans. 42, 74–81 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C.G.M. Liu, F.L. Liu, H.M. Cheng, Frequency response characteristic of single-walled carbon nanotubes as supercapacitor electrode material. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(14), 143108 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Meliciob, J. Catalao, V. Mendes, Fractional-order control and simulation of wind turbines with full-power converters. in 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, Malta, pp. 320–325 (2010)

  23. K. Moaddy, A. Radwan, K. Salama, S. Momani, I. Hashim, The fractional order modeling and synchronization of electrically coupled neuron systems. Comput. Math. Appl. 64(10), 3329–3339 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Mondal, K. Biswas, Performance study of fractional order integrator using single-component fractional order element. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 5(4), 334–342 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Monje, Y. Chen, B. Vinagre, D. Xue, V. Feliu-Batlle, Fractional-Order Systems and Controls (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. A.N. Morozovska, E.A. Eliseev, S.V. Kalinin, Electromechanical probing of ionic currents in energy storage materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(22), 222906 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K.B. Oldham, C.G. Zoski, Analogue instrumentation for processing polarographic data. J. Electroanal. Chem. 157, 27–51 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.A. Osman, A.R. West, Electrical characterization and equivalent circuit analysis of (bi\(_{1.5}\) zn\(_{0.5}\)) (nb\(_{0.5}\) ti\(_{1.5}\))o \(_{7}\) pyrochlore, a relaxor ceramic. J. Appl. Phys. 109(7), 074106 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. C.M.A. Pinto, R.M. Carvalho, New findings on the dynamics of hiv and tb coinfection models. Appl. Math. Comput. 242, 36–46 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. I. Podlubny, Fractional-order systems and p i \(^{\lambda }\) d \(^{\mu }\)-controllers. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44(1), 208–214 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Radwan, K. Salama, Passive and active elements using fractional circuit. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 58(10), 2388–2397 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Radwan, A. Shamim, K. Salama, Theory of fractional order elements based impedance matching networks. IEEE Microw. Compon. Lett. 21(3), 120–122 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A.G. Radwan, K.N. Salama, Fractional-order rc and rl circuits. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 31(6), 1901–1915 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. S.C.D. Roy, On the realization of a constant-argument immittance of fractional operator. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 14(3), 264–274 (1967)

  35. A.M. Soliman, Synthesis of generalized impedance converter and inverter circuits using nam expansion, in Analog/RF and Mixed-Signal Circuit Systematic Design, ed. by M. Fakhfakh, E. Tlelo-Cuautle, R. Castro-Lopez (Springer, New York, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. M.C. Tripathy, K. Biswas, S. Sen, A design example of a fractional-order kerwin huelsman newcomb biquad filter with two fractional capacitors of different order. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 32, 1523–1526 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. M.C. Tripathy, D. Mondal, K. Biswas, S. Sen, Design and performance study of phase-locked loops (plls) using fractional order loop filters. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 43(6), 776–792 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M.C. Tripathy, D. Mondal, K. Biswas, S. Sen, Experimental studies on realization of fractional inductors and fractional-order bandpass filters. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 43(9), 1183–1196 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. C.C. Tseng, Design of fir and iir fractional order simpson digital integrators. Signal Process. 87, 1045–1057 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Valsa, J. Vlach, RC models of a constant phase element. Intl. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 41(1), 59–67 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Xu, C.C. Mi, B. Cao, J. Cao, Frequency response characteristic of single-walled carbon nanotubes as supercapacitor electrode material. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(4), 143108 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the SGBSI Project, 2014, (Project Code: CEI) Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy (SRIC), IIT Kharagpur, India, for providing financial support to carry out the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishek Adhikary.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A Discussion on Fractance Unit

This paper presents \(\mho /\)s\(^\alpha \) as the unit of fractance. The ambiguity may arise from the fact that fractance unit is dependent on the exponent value. As the exponent changes, the unit changes! For example, in Table I, we see that the fractor \(F_{0.3}\) has fractance value 13.3 \(\upmu \mho /\)s\(^{0.3}\) and the fractor \(F_{0.4}\) has fractance value 7.56 \(\upmu \mho /\)s\(^{0.4}\). Both the elements are fractors, but they have different units for their fractance values. This is explained as follows: The word ‘fractor’ does not indicate a single type of element rather a set of elements. Every fractor who has different \(\alpha \) is actually different element of this set named ‘fractor’. That means, though both \(F_{0.3}\) and \(F_{0.4}\) are categorized as fractor, but they are different elements because they have different \(\alpha \) value. So, it is logical that they have different units. (just like resistor and inductor, both are categorized as CPE, yet they are different element, hence, has different units, \(\Omega \) and \(\Omega \)s (H), respectively)

According to some recent works, fractor’s impedance can be presented as,

$$\begin{aligned} Z_F(j\omega ) = \dfrac{Q}{(j \omega /\omega _N)^{\alpha }}, \end{aligned}$$
(24)

where \(\omega _N\) is a normalizing frequency, Q is the coefficient, and \(\alpha \) is the exponent. The main advantage of this representation is that the unit of Q is Ohm only which is easier to interpret. However, such realization bring a third variable, \(\omega _N\) which is yet to be defined properly. For the realized fractors, presented in this paper, if we chose \(\omega _N\) as 1 Hz, then the value of 1 / Q will be same as the fractance F. The only difference is that the unit of 1 / Q will be \(\mho \) instead of \(\mho /\)s\(^{\alpha }\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adhikary, A., Sen, P., Sen, S. et al. Design and Performance Study of Dynamic Fractors in Any of the Four Quadrants. Circuits Syst Signal Process 35, 1909–1932 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-015-0213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-015-0213-3

Keywords

Navigation