Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Combined PSO-SVM Models in Fault Prediction of Relay Protection Equipment

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since there are no monitoring devices in relay protection equipment of substations, it takes up a lot of manpower and material resources in operation and maintenance (O&M), and the efficiency is very low. In this paper, we solve the giving fault prediction model by applying particle swarm optimization algorithm and support vector machine algorithm for relay protection equipment. The combined model was found to be able to establish the correlation between the variables more accurately and improve the prediction accuracy of the model by comparison. The simulation result shows that the prediction accuracy of the model is at least 91% for three different devices. The combined prediction model can not only provide strong technical support for the maintenance strategy of relay protection equipment but also improve the maintenance efficiency and reduce the failure rate of protection equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.

References

  1. H. Bernardes, M. Tonelli-Neto, C.R. Minussi, Fault classification in power distribution systems using multiresolution analysis and a fuzzy-ARTMAP neural network analysis and a fuzzy-ARTMAP neural network. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 19(11), 1824–1831 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Dai, H. Song, Y. Yang, Y. Chen, G. Sheng, X. Jiang, Concentration prediction of dissolved gases in transformer oil based on deep belief networks. Power. Syst. Technol. 41, 2737–2742 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Dalai, B. Chatterjee, D. Dey, S. Chakravorti, K. Bhattacharya, Rough-set-based feature selection and classification for power quality sensing device employing correlation techniques. IEEE Sens. J. 13(2), 563–573 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Dong, Combining unsupervised and supervised learning for asset class failure prediction in power systems. IEEE Trans. Power. Syst. 34(6), 5033–5043 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Garcia-Gonzalo, J.L. Fernandez-Martinez, A brief historical review of particle swarm optimization (PSO). J. Bioin. Intell. Control. 1(1), 3–16 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Ghimire, C. Zhang, K.R. Pattipati, A rough set-theory-based fault-diagnosis method for an electric power-steering system. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 23(5), 2042–2053 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N.A. Hitam, A.R. Ismail, F. Saeed, An optimized support vector machine (SVM) based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) for cryptocurrency forecasting. Procedia. Comput. Sci. 163, 427–433 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Jiang, R. Chen, C. Zhang, M. Chen, X. Li, G. Ma, Dynamic fault prediction of power transformers based on lasso regression and change point detection by dissolved gas analysis. IEEE Trans. Dielect. El. In. 27(6), 2130–2137 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Jiang, Z. Li, N. Wu, M. Zhou, A Petri net approach to fault diagnosis and restoration for power transmission systems to avoid the output interruption of substations. IEEE Syst. J. 12(3), 2566–2576 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P.G. León, J. García-Morales, R. Escobar-Jiménez, J. Gómez-Aguilar, G. López-López, L. Torres, Implementation of a fault tolerant system for the internal combustion engine’s MAF sensor. Measurement 122, 91–99 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Li, A. Monti, F. Ponci, Fault detection and classification in medium voltage dc shipboard power systems with wavelets and artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 63(11), 2651–2665 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Liu, Q. Meng, K. Wang, Establishment and application of defect knowledge platform for maintaining secondary equipment. Northeast Electr. Power. Techno. 41(10), 15–18 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Liu, K. Hu, A model-based diagnosis system for a traction power supply system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 13(6), 2834–2843 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Lu, Y. Tang, D. Zeng, F. Yan, Y. Zheng, Fault prediction of electromagnetic launch system based on knowledge prediction time series. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 57(2), 1830–1839 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Makridakis, E. Spiliotis, V. Assimakopoulos, The M4 competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. Int. J. Forecasting. 37(3), 54–74 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Mohammadian, F. Aminifar, N. Amjady, M. Shahidehpour, Data-driven classifier for extreme outage prediction based on Bayes decision theory. IEEE Trans. Power. Syst. 36(6), 4906–4914 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Namigtle-Jiménez, R. Escobar-Jiménez, J. Gómez-Aguilar, C. García-Beltrán, A. Téllez-Anguiano, Online ann-based fault diagnosis implementation using an FPGA: application in the EFI system of a vehicle. ISA Trans. 100, 358–372 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Shao, H. Wang, B. He, Quality assessment and improvement method for power grid equipment defect text. Power. Syst. Techno. 43(4), 1472–1479 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Sheng, H. Hou, X. Jiang, Y. Chen, A novel association rule mining method of big data for power transformers state parameters based on probabilistic graph model. IEEE Trans. Smart. Grid. 9(2), 695–702 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Sheng, D. Wang, W. Ma, S. Luo, J. Wu, Exploration of intelligent operation management system of relay protection based on big data. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 47(22), 168–175 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Solís-Pérez, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, J. Hernández, R. Escobar-Jiménez, E. Viera-Martin, R. Conde-Gutiérrez, U. Cruz-Jacobo, Global optimization algorithms applied to solve a multi-variable inverse artificial neural network to improve the performance of an absorption heat transformer with energy recycling. Appl. Soft. Comput. 85, 105801 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Srivastava, S.K. Parida, A robust fault detection and location prediction module using support vector machine and gaussian process regression for ac microgrid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 58(1), 930–939 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S.F. Stefenon, M.H.D.M. Ribeiro, A. Nied, V.C. Mariani, L. dos Santos Coelho, D.F.M. da Rocha, R.B. Grebogi, A.E. de Barros Ruano, Wavelet group method of data handling for fault prediction in electrical power insulators. Int. J. Elec. Power. 123, 106269 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Sun, S. Ding, Z. Zhang, W. Jia, An improved grid search algorithm to optimize SVR for prediction. Soft. Comput. 25(7), 5633–5644 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Wang, W. Pedrycz, Z. Li, M. Zhou, Residual-driven fuzzy C-means clustering for image segmentation. IEEE/CAA J. Automatic. 8(4), 876–789 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Wang, W. Pedrycz, Z. Li, M. Zhou, S. Ge, G-image segmentation: similarity-preserving fuzzy C-means with spatial information constraint in wavelet space. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29(12), 3887–3898 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Wang, W. Pedrycz, J. Yang, M. Zhou, Z. Li, Wavelet frame-based fuzzy C-means clustering for segmenting images on graphs. IEEE Trans. Cybernetics. 50(9), 3938–3949 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Wang, J. Zhao, Q. Sun, H. Zhu, Probability modeling for PV array output interval and its application in fault diagnosis. Energy 189, 116248 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Gou, Power system fault classification and prediction based on a three-layer data mining structure. IEEE Access. 8, 200897–200914 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. X. Wu, J. Li, Q. Huang, Big data-based transformer substation fault prediction method. J. Electron. Sci. Technol. 19(2), 173–185 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.K. Yang, A condition-based failure-prediction and processing-scheme for preventive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 52(3), 373–383 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Yang, H. Hou, Y. Yang, Association rule mining and prediction method for transmission line operation parameters based on Bayesian model. Power. Syst. Technol. 41(11), 3648–3654 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Ying, Y. Jia, W. Li, Research on state evaluation and risk assessment for relay protection system based on machine learning algorithm. IET Gener. Transm. Dis. 14(18), 3619–3629 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Liu, Z. Bao, Data-based line trip fault prediction in power systems using LSTM networks and SVM. IEEE Access 6, 7675–7686 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Z. Zhou, Machine Learning (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. Zhu, Y. Shi, H. Wang, L. Lu, New feature extraction method for photovoltaic array output time series and its application in fault diagnosis. IEEE J. of Photovolt. 10(4), 1133–1141 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Zhu, L. Huo, J. Lu, Bayesian networks-based approach for power systems fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Power. Deliver. 21(2), 634–639 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Prof. Binwu Zhang from the Institute of Intelligent Optimization and Control of Hohai University for their enthusiastic guidance and constructive suggestions.

Funding

This paper is supported by the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation Limited (SGJSCZ00KJJS2100747), in part by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant No.52077058.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Changzhou Power Supply Branch, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd, Changzhou, 213003, Jiangsu, China

    Huang Yuming, Luo Jiaohong, Ma Zhenguo, Tang Bing & Zhang Keqi

  2. College of Science, Hohai University, Changzhou, 213022, Jiangsu, China

    Zhang Jianyong

Authors
  1. Huang Yuming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luo Jiaohong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ma Zhenguo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tang Bing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhang Keqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhang Jianyong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y. Huang contributed to conceptualization and investigation; J. Luo contributed to methodology and data curation; B. Tang contributed to validation and project administration; Z. Ma contributed to formal analysis and writing—review and editing; K. Zhang contributed to resources and writing—original draft preparation; and J. Zhang contributed to visualization and funding acquisition and supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Jianyong.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuming, H., Jiaohong, L., Zhenguo, M. et al. On Combined PSO-SVM Models in Fault Prediction of Relay Protection Equipment. Circuits Syst Signal Process 42, 875–891 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02056-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02056-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation