Skip to main content
Log in

Hard examples for the bounded depth Frege proof system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
computational complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove exponential lower bounds on the size of a bounded depth Frege proof of a Tseitin graph-based contradiction, whenever the underlying graph is an expander. This is the first example of a contradiction, naturally formalized as a 3-CNF, that has no short bounded depth Frege proofs. Previously, lower bounds of this type were known only for the pigeonhole principle and for Tseitin contradictions based on complete graphs.

Our proof is a novel reduction of a Tseitin formula of an expander graph to the pigeonhole principle, in a manner resembling that done by Fu and Urquhart for complete graphs.

In the proof we introduce a general method for removing extension variables without significantly increasing the proof size, which may be interesting in its own right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eli Ben-Sasson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Sasson, E. Hard examples for the bounded depth Frege proof system. comput. complex. 11, 109–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-002-0172-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-002-0172-5

Keywords.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000).

Navigation