Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Automatizability of Bounded-Depth Frege Proofs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
computational complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In this paper, we show how to extend the argument due to Bonet, Pitassi and Raz to show that bounded-depth Frege proofs do not have feasible interpolation, assuming that factoring of Blum integers or computing the Diffie–Hellman function is sufficiently hard. It follows as a corollary that bounded-depth Frege is not automatizable; in other words, there is no deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that will output a short proof if one exists. A notable feature of our argument is its simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Luisa Bonet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonet, M.L., Domingo, C., Gavaldà, R. et al. Non-Automatizability of Bounded-Depth Frege Proofs. comput. complex. 13, 47–68 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-004-0183-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-004-0183-5

Keywords.

Subject classification.

Navigation