Skip to main content
Log in

Signature analysis and defect detection in layered manufacturing of ceramic sensors and actuators

  • Published:
Machine Vision and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper presents the concept of a process signature for the use of online signature analysis and defect detection in the layered manufacturing (LM) of ceramic sensors and actuators. To achieve the high quality of parts built by the fused deposition of ceramics (FDC), an online process-monitoring system is implemented to detect the processing defects. Using a process signature extracted from the image of a layer captured by the monitoring system, an ideal image is created that is then compared to the original image to detect and identify the defects. Some results of signature analysis and defect detection for single-material and multi-material parts are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya RS, Laurette R (1988) Mathematical morphology for 3-D image analysis. In: Proceeding of ICASSP ‘88, New York, pp 952-955

  2. Agarwala MK, Bandyopadhyay A, Weeren RV, Safari A, Danforth SC (1996) FDC, Rapid Fabrication of Structural Components. Am Ceram Soc Bull 75(11):60-65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alparone L, Barni M, Betti M, Garzelli A (1997) Fuzzy clustering of textured SAR images based on a fractal dimension feature. In: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), vol 3, pp 1184-1186

  4. Argawala MK (1996b) Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition. Rapid Prototyping J 2:4-19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botha E, Richards J, Casasent DP (1989) Optical laboratory morphological inspection processor. Appl Opt 285:5344-5350

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouhal A, Jafari MA, Han WB, Fang T (1999) Tracking control and trajectory planning in layered manufacturing applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2:445-451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin RT (1988) Survey: automated visual inspection: 1981-1987. Comput Vision Graph Image Process 41:346-381

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comb JW, Priedeman WR, Turley PW (1994) FDM technology process improvements. In: Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Tex., pp 42-49

  9. Crimmins TR, Brown WR (1985) Image algebra and automatic shape recognition. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Sys 21:60-69

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeGroot M (1986) Probability and statistics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston

  11. Fang T, Jafari MA, Bakhadyrov I (1998) On-line detection of defects in layered manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Belgium, pp 254-259

  12. Fang T, Jafari MA (2000) A statistical feedback control architecture for layered manufacturing. J Mater Process Manuf Sci 7:397-404

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez C, Campoy P, Platero C, Sebastian JM, Aracil R (1993) On-line surface inspection for continuous cast aluminum strip. In: Computer Vision for industry, Proceeding SPIE, pp 26-37

  14. Iqbal M, Mahmood W, Vachtsevanos G (1997) Automated pilling detection and fuzzy classification of textile fabrics. In: Machine Vision applications in Industrial Inspection V, SPIE, San Jose, pp 26-36

  15. Jain A, Nalini K, Ratha K, Lakshmanan S (1997) Object detection using Gabor filters. Pattern Recogn 30(2):295-309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalaj BH, Aghajan HK, Kailath T (1992) Automated Direct Patterened Wafer Inspection. In: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, Palm Springs, Calif.

  17. Narayan S (1997) Identification of dolphin signature whistles using artificial neural networks, SPIE, vol 3077, pp 319-322

  18. Oguz SH, Onural L (1991) An automated system for design-rule-based visual inspection of printed circuit boards. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol 3, Sacramento, Calif., pp 2696-2701

  19. Patek DR, Tobin KW, Jachter L (1996) Machine Vision Inspection of Technical Ceramics, Machine Vision Applications in Industrial Inspection IV, SPIE, San Jose, Calif., SPIE Proceedings, vol 2665, pp 253-257

  20. Penman D, Olsson O, Bowman C (1992) Automatic inspection of reconstituted wood panels for surface defects. In: Machine Vision Applications, Architectures, and System Integration, SPIE 1823, pp 284-292

  21. Ritter R, Reick M, Schmitz B, Goch G (1996) Nondestructive and contactless evaluation of surface coatings and adhesion defects by photo thermal radiometry. In: Optical Inspection and Micromeasurements Conference, SPIE Proceedings Series, vol 2782, Besancon, France, 10-14 June, pp 662-673

  22. Seaton JM, Abbott AL (1992) Comparison of multiresolution morphological and Laplacian techniques for automated inspection. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 1708, Bellingham, Wash., pp 789-800

  23. Shih FY, Mitchell OR (1988) Automated fast recognition and location of arbitrarily shaped objects by image morphology. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ann Arbor, Mich., pp 774-779

  24. Tafuri M, Branca A, Attolico G, Distante A, Delaney B (1996) Automatic leather inspection of defected patterns. In: Machine Vision applications in Industrial Inspection IV, SPIE, San Jose, Calif., pp 108-119

  25. Tobin KW, Gleason SS, Karnowski TP, Cohen SL (1997) Feature analysis and classification of manufacturing signatures based on semiconductor wafermaps. In: Machine Vision Applications in Industrial Inspection V, SPIE, San Jose, pp 14-25

  26. Tyberg J, Bohn JH. (1998) Calibrating fused deposition modeling rapid prototyping systems for adaptive build layer thickness. In: Proceedings of Third Pacific International Conference on Advanced Materials and Processing, pp 1573-1579

  27. Weeren RV, Agarwala M, Jamalabad VR, Bandyophyay A, Vaidyanathan R, Langrana N, Safari A, Whalen P, Danforth SC, Ballard C (1995) Quality of parts processed by fused position. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Tex.

  28. Wu H, Siegel M, Khosla P (1998) Vehicle sound signature recognition by frequency vector principal component analysis. In. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Conference, St. Paul, Minn.

  29. Yan X, Gu P (1996) A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Comput-Aided Des 28(4): 307-318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 July 1999, Accepted: 21 October 2001, Published online: 29 October 2003

Correspondence to: Mohsen A. Jafari

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research under grant # N-0014-96-1-1175. Ref. US Patent # S-5738817, April 14, 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, T., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S.C. et al. Signature analysis and defect detection in layered manufacturing of ceramic sensors and actuators. Machine Vision and Applications 15, 63–75 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-002-0074-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-002-0074-1

Keywords:

Navigation