Abstract
Inspired by the operation of human social organisation, this paper presents a new architecture—a pyramid-committee—for developing society-oriented intelligence, whose structure imitates the organisation of human society in its decision making. The system takes a pyramid-like hierarchical structure with links in the pyramid forming a semi-lattice, which relate not only to nodes in the same layer, but also to others in different layers. The output of the system is a result of the negotiation and balancing of different interests. For such a system to function, the main difficulties concern the complicated relationships between different factors or agents. Focussing on the airport environment audit, we discuss the development of a model framework and the role of neural networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allenby B (2000) Industrial ecology, information and sustainability. Foresight 2(2):163–171
Ashford N, Stanton HPM, Moore CA (1984) Airport operations. Wiley, New York
Calderón EJ (2000) An applied method for the assessment of sustainability of urban pilot projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):289–298
Connor TS (1980) Integrated noise model—the Federal Aviation Administration’s computer program for predicting noise exposure around an airport. In: Proceedings of the international conference on noise engineering (Inter-Noise’80), Miami, Florida, December 1980, pp 127–130
Fletcher GP, Hinde CJ (1995) Using neural networks as a tool for constructing rule based systems. Knowl Based Syst 8(4):183–189, ISSN 0950-7051/95
Fletcher GP, Hinde CJ (1996) Producing evidence for the hypotheses of large neural networks. Neurocomputing 10(4):359–373 ISSN 0925-2312/96
Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithm in search, optimisation and machine learning. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts
Habermas J (1979) What is universal pragmatics? Communication and the evolution of society. Heinemann, London
Harre R, Gillett G (1994) The discursive mind. Sage, London
Hecht-Nielson R (1989) Theory of the back-propagation neural network. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’89), Washington, District of Columbia, June 1989, vol 1, pp 593–611
Janić M (2000) Air transport system analysis and modelling: capacity, quality of services and economics. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preference and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York
Kiely G (1998) Environmental engineering. McGraw Hill international editions: chemical and petroleum engineering series. McGraw Hill, New York
Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York
Mato R, Mufuruki T (1999) Noise pollution associated with the operation of the Dar es Salaam International Airport. Transport Res D Transport Environ 4(2):81–89
Morrell P, Lu C (2000) Aircraft noise social cost and charge mechanisms—a case study of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Transport Res D Transport Environ 5(4):305–320
O’Lone RG (1991) Mass of dilemmas forcing operators to mesh airport use with environment. Aviat Week Space Technol 135(21):86
Raper D, Longhurst J, Conlan D (1994) The impact of airport operations on urban air quality. In: Brebbia CA, Power H, Zannetti P, Baldasano JM (eds) Air pollution II, vol 2: pollution control and monitoring. Computational Mechanics Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts
Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1: foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Towell GG, Shavlik JW (1993) Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Machine Learn 13(1):71–101
Upham P, Yang Y, Raper D, Thomas C, Gillingwater D, Hinde CJ (2004) Mitigating environmental constraints at airports through long term planning: a decision support approach. Air Traffic Control Q 12(2):107–124
Yang Y, Hinde CJ, Gillingwater D (2001) A new method to evaluate a trained neural network. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN 2001), Washington, District of Columbia, July 2001, pp 2620–2625, ISBN 0-7803-7046-5
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s “Sustainable Cities Programme” for the support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Gillingwater, D. & Hinde, C. A conceptual framework for society-oriented decision support. AI & Soc 19, 279–291 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-004-0314-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-004-0314-1