Skip to main content
Log in

Innovation and systems change: the example of mobile, collaborative workplaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forces such as increasing globalisation, demographic change, European enlargement, and the emergence of networked organisations stimulate the emergence of new forms of organisation and collaborative working. Mobility, sharing of information and knowledge, and collaboration across organisational networks are key aspects of workplace innovations. New information and communication technologies enable a diversity of future workplace scenarios. However, coping with the human and organisational aspects involved will determine their success or failure. In order to exploit the potential of workplace innovations we, therefore, must better understand their systemic nature. This article, based on the MOSAIC project, explores the potential of mobile and multi-location collaborative workplaces, investigates some future scenarios and roadmaps, and discusses the strategies and research approaches for systemic innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The MOSAIC project is a Specific Support Action under the 6th Framework Programme within the Information Society Technologies (IST) priority of the European Commission, and will be completed in October 2005. In close collaboration with the European Commission (2004), MOSAIC has also launched in the Ambient Intelligence @ Work Communities. See: http://www.mosaic-network.org/

  2. See the Collaboration@Work 2004 report from the European Commission Directorate Information Society for an overview of new working environments and practices in EU member states

  3. This section summarises MOSAIC work carried out by Fernando et al. (2004), for aerospace and building and construction sectors, and Saranummi (2004), for healthcare

  4. See Empirica, (2003), for a typology for mobile workplaces as part of the STAR project, including a set of criteria for distinguishing between different types of mobile working

  5. See http://www.testplatsbotnia.com. Within the AMI@Work Communities, a Special Interest Group on Living Laboratories has been initiated lead by Mats Eriksson, manager of Testbed Botnia

  6. See http://www.gigaport.nl/info/en/home.jsp. Since 2003, Gigaport is continued focussing on network infrastructure

  7. See: http://www.freeband.nl/. The size of the Freeband programme, running from 2002–2009, is 85 ME. The programme is managed by the Telematica Instituut and co-funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Velthausz, 2004, in his MBA end term report, has given a detailed analysis of organizational arrangements of Freeband and its predecessor, the GigaPort programme running 1999–2003

  8. Not all experiments are successful in all aspects. The Netherlands Knowledge Village (Kenniswijk) in Eindhoven, providing a real-life city environment for innovative broadband service development and adoption, and based on a public-private partnership, did not meet targets as regards the number of services and development of the broadband infrastructure. Economic developments played a role in the decreasing willingness of companies to invest, besides difficulties in the scaling up of services and in creating economically viable services

References

  • Empirica (2003) More yo-yos, pendulums and nomads: trends of mobile and multi-location work in the information society. In: Stefan Lilischkis (ed) STAR project issue report N. 36, Draft

  • European Commission (2004) Collaboration@work. The 2004 report on new working evironments and pactices

  • Fernando T, Huovila P, Baudier Y, Varalda G, Skaerbaek J (2004) Life cycle management@work. Document on current business challenges in automotive, aerospace and construction. Draft MOSAIC project report D2.3

  • Kemp R, Rotmans J (2001) ‘The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In: International conference towards environmental innovation systems, Garmisch Partenkirchen

  • Malone TW (2004) The future of work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Laurbacher R, Scott Morton MS (2003) Inventing the organizations of the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (1999) Crossing the chasm. Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSAIC Consortium (2005) Mobile workplaces roadmap report. Draft MOSAIC Project Report D1.2

  • O’Doherty D, Arnold E (2003) Understanding Innovation: the need for a systemic approach. The IPTS Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper R (2003) The knowledge society Delphi: executive summary of main results. PREST http://les1.man.ac.uk/PREST/euforia/reports.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. MacMillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J (2003) Transitiemanagement, Sleutel voor een duurzame samenleving. (Transition Management. Key to a Sustainable Society) Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen

  • Saranummi N (2004) Citizen network of professionals: well-being services@work. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) eAdoption and the Knowledge Economy. IOS, Amsterdam pp 1527–1533

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffers H (2004) Understanding mobile workplace innovation. In: Cunningham P, Cunningham M (eds) eAdoption and the Knowledge Economy. IOS, Amsterdam pp 1433–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules. A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits R, Kuhlmann S (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. Int J Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1&2):4–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdill P, Dhondt S, Milsome S (2002) Partners at work? A report to Europe’s policy makers and social partners. Report of the Hi-Res Project funded by DG Research

  • Velthausz D (2004) Organising complex research programs to stimulate both knowledge creation and business innovation. TSM Business School, EMBA 15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Schaffers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaffers, H. Innovation and systems change: the example of mobile, collaborative workplaces. AI & Soc 19, 334–347 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0318-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0318-5

Keywords

Navigation